The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Nowadays we live in a highly competitive world where only hardworking and engrossed people can become successful in some field. Some people have a claim that the best preparation for leadership in any field is an ability to survive in competition. On the contrary, other people are sure that only cooperation will help youths to become real leaders. Undoubtedly, the statement given is rather controversial; however, a closer examination reveals that the best way to prepare young people for leadership in any field is to teach them working in cooperation.
The first reason in support of my position is that collaboration lets young people learn from one another. As people of young age are mostly inexperienced, it would be particularly useful for them to hear out somebody else’s opinion, which will help youths to avoid some mistakes in the future life. Moreover, working or studying together means that participants always can ask for help or advice. In contrast to collaboration, being in competition means that you should do everything on your own, which will make your progress slower.
Another point to be made is that collaboration brings new acquaintances. New acquaintances are one of the most important parts of people’s lives because it is rather hard to survive in this world on your own. Connection with another people will help youths to avoid some unnecessary mistakes and to find a right path quicker. There are many stories of powerful and wealthy individuals who reached such a success because they had been familiar with people who supported them on their way. Being alone on your life path makes everything harder, and not everyone can handle the lack of support.
Of course, competition has some benefits, too. It is undeniable that while competing, we try to strive for more successful people because it is everyone’s dream to become the best. Whereas there is someone who performs better, you will always have a goal to beat them, which will pull you forward. However, such motivation is not always positive. Many people, trying to become the best, perform unfairly. That brings pessimism, hostility, and hatred between people, which can lead to undesirable consequences.
The last reason in support of my opinion is that working in cooperation teaches people to tolerate and understand one another. Ability to hearing others out, admit another point of view, be able to come to a compromise is an important thing. Working together often teaches youths to be pleasant people.
Once there are arguments to be made for both sides, it is clear that cooperation is the best way to become prepared for leadership in any field.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 66
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 58
- Some employers are sure that control helps to increase productivity and create a team spirit, which would lead to better results so that firms could gain more profit. Other people claim that there is no need in keeping an eye on workers. 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in contrast, of course, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13272311213 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87935694136 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510297482838 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7717144993 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5217391304 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269099664231 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750858808668 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101581252073 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159819959836 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124400963642 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.