The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or any other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
A society is best able to succeed and thrive as a result of their ability to communicate with each other and work together as people. Leaders are necessary and even helpful in all fields, with successful leaders distinguishable by their ability to understand and relate to those they are leading. In order to ensure that young people will be apposite leaders in a society, teaching a strong understanding of cooperation and its' necessity will bode better for the individuals and the society, as opposed to instilling a sense of competition.
Leadership in government, industry, or any other field will involve an individual or group of individuals leading or overseeing a likely larger, diverse group of people. Understanding cooperation and how to compromise are necessary traits for leaders to ensure that all people are working well together. In an example of a manager overseeing a group of workers, a leader must understand how those workers think and behave, which may be drastically different from the manager. It is important to communicate and understand other's perspectives in order to maximize efficiency and output, while minimizing stress and failure. The ability for a leader to view situations from others' points of view can foster mutual understanding about goals as well as struggles. A strong leader would be able to clearly understand why individuals have certain values and expectations, and eventually understand their stance and perspective without even inquiring. A strong leader would understand the importance of working together within and between teams and groups of people.
More likely than not a leader will need to work with other leaders, either in the same group or between different groups. The importance of cooperation and teamwork are further emphasized here, as a strong leader should be able to not only communicate with and understand those they oversee, but also those they work with. Leaders on the same team should be able to cooperate and communicate enough to agree on important goals and struggles. If all leaders in an area are not in agreement about focusing on the betterment of the team, issues could arise and hinder success and progress. A sense of competition can lead to argument and even conflict, which can waste valuable time and resources in nearly any situation.
Instilling a sense of competition in young people does not well prepare them for leadership as it teaches young people to focus on themselves instead of understand others and what may be best for the group as a whole. It also may impede the ability to work through issues or disagreements, as one would be used to navigating barriers for personal and individual success, rather than the growth of the group or team. While one must concede that cooperation could, in some circumstances, lead to complacency and reaching less than one's potential, it is still a far more important and innocuous than focusing on instilling competitive nature. Leaders are most successful in their positions when those they lead like and respect them.
Focusing on fostering teamwork and cooperation can lead to greater success and less conflict than a focus on individual success and competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
A society is best able to succeed and thrive as a result ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 530, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d to complacency and reaching less than ones potential, it is still a far more impor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, well, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 39.0 14.8657303371 262% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2694.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18076923077 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94986711164 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426923076923 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 840.6 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.820346558 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.7 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196732844426 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629637432015 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946201242744 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112756985331 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794846651363 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.