The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim.
Society must inhibit values of cooperation instead of competition among the young people not only for leadership but in any field they wish to pursue for their better futures.
Cooperation results from amalgam of other values such as humanity, team work, magnanimity, etc. and several others which ultimately results in better society around us. So for young people to be successful in any field or activity, they must try to inculcate such values and in return, society must prepare them on such grounds instead of just trying to compete in between. Hence, cooperation along with other values bolsters the young generation to be successful in their respective careers.
Society, on the other hand sometimes tend to inculcate competition among young people by unintentionally placing them amidst the macabre of caste, sex or religion. Not only society but individuals themselves sometimes perceive differences based on above factors to give rise to a sense of hatred among the themselves. This not only hampers the individual but also has devastating effects on society. Therefore, society and members of it must try to avoid such influences and must try to work for welfare of others.
Next contributing factor towards leadership is thought process. This, completely, is devoid of society, instead is based on the given person. Young people are the building blocks for any society. They tend to act in a way which is derived from their thought processes. An individual who thinks of society first, will always try to contribute towards society in any possible way. On the other hand, individual who just thinks of himself first, will always try to circumvent their duties towards society. Hence, apart from cooperation, thinking perspective of an individual also matters.
Society, alone is not the only contributor towards creating leadership among young people. Instead, it just plays a minor role among several other factors. Hence, young people should themselves must be first rigid enough in their thought processes to be successful in their respective streams they choose to contribute towards.
- Mima mounds are low, flattened, domelike mounds composed of loose unstratified sediment as a over-thickened top soil (A Horizon). These mounds come in many sizes of mound and groups of mounds. There are three theories on how Mima mounds originated.The fir 81
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 303, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'themselves'?
Suggestion: the; themselves
...to give rise to a sense of hatred among the themselves. This not only hampers the individual b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, apart from, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35329341317 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74546163902 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488023952096 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2158788915 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1052631579 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197462104406 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651942484957 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512527392774 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125355955392 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424096187208 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.