The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The author of the statement claim that the youth should be prepared for leadership in various fields by teaching them a sense of cooperation, not by the competition. Many of us will argue that it will hold all the time and others will counter it by providing examples. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
Youth is the one that will decide the future of any country. If they are being taught good values, good qualities and getting a positive environment in their childhood or while they are upbringing then they will help the nation in building good future or if a youth get negative environment or being taught false things that they will destroy or will be deleterious for their country. For example, if take two countries from the Southeast Asia India and Pakistan, then you will find out that because of the negativity and government supporting terrorist groups, the youth of Pakistan IS ON WRONG TRACK and creating issues for their own country, while in India, younger generation is getting positive environment and making India a powerhouse in the world.
There can be a different way to prepare young people for the prosperity of a country and their own itself and one of the method suggested by the author is that they should be teaching leadership and other qualities with the sense of cooperation, not by the mean of the competition. I like the author's suggestion to teaching the qualities with a sense of cooperation because without being cooperative in nature one cannot succeed in his/her life. Through cooperation, you won't only gain the confidence of others but also get the essence of the leadership quality.
But there should be a sense of competition also among young people because without competition they won't get the sense of where they are standing among all. But competition should be a healthy one not to demean anyone if it so then it could have a negative impact on the young minds. So, according to my, it will be a good combination if society will be able to teach the young generation good qualities with cooperation and with healthy competition.
In sum, we can say that the young generation is the future of their country so they should get the best way and a good environment in an early age.
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models. 50
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the 59
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- as people rely more amnd more on technology to slove there problem , the ability of human to thing for themselve will surely deteriorate 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rious for their country. For example, if take two countries from the Southeast As...
^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...the mean of the competition. I like the authors suggestion to teaching the qualities wi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78304239401 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68192170383 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431421446384 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.6137152621 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.538461538 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8461538462 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211984246554 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915066195675 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975035149683 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130763316558 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683908610644 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.