The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
This topic raises the controversial question of whether the best way to prepare future leaders is making them develop cooperation competences instead of making them more competitive. Indisputably, leaders who have been used to cooperate are generally better in their leadership than leaders who are just competitive. Nevertheless, competitivity is also important, because without it the people will probably have little chances of winning their leadership. Thus, I would argue future leaders should be educated for cooperation but should also be a little competitive.
First of all, if a leader is more concerned about cooperation the leader's main concern will be to assure their subordinates are coopering. The leader will not make their subordinates to try to be better individually but as a whole. This kind of aproach is more effective in increasing productivity. It is as a team it is possible to have the better ideas and the best solutions to solve a problem. Automatically, the organization also becomes more competitive.
Secondly, if the leader is concerned about cooperation instead of competition, there is less chance for him of commiting bad practices like corruption, wars, unfair salaries and bad working conditions. The leader will not try to always have a richer country or a more powerful factory, for instance. The leader will more unlikely look only for numbers that characterize the performance of some organization but for people and the way they work, which is always dependent on their satisfation.
However, if the leader has any sense of cooperation, there is a risk he cannot earn the elections. Leaders should also understand how people's minds work in order to win the competions to become leaders. They should know they have to show people they are better than the others. Otherwise they will never be leaders.
In conclusion, society should prepare young people for leadership instilling them mostly a sense of cooperation than competition but they also understand competion is important for them to become leaders.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 66
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Indisputably, leaders who have been used to cooperate are generally better in the...
^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...people they are better than the others. Otherwise they will never be leaders. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214484679666 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.16713091922 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.08356545961 0.0880659088768 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0891364902507 0.0497285424764 179% => OK
Pronouns: 0.058495821727 0.0444667217837 132% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.103064066852 0.12292977631 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0306406685237 0.0406280797675 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06863322056 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.033426183844 0.030933414821 108% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.08356545961 0.0997080785238 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0362116991643 0.0249443105267 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0139275766017 0.0148568991511 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2055.0 2732.02544248 75% => OK
No of words: 326.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.3036809816 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398773006135 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28527607362 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208588957055 0.200843997647 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.168711656442 0.132149295362 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06863322056 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 219.290929204 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 51.1521369138 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1764705882 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.391032065 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 141.124799967 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 0.674092028746 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 47.7040779502 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.10619469027 1.64882698954 67% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35765991676 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101499727864 0.123202303941 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.075988434594 0.077325440228 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.534086439236 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162032124501 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130436428505 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758671839494 0.0892212321368 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.32602114757 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0614050204699 0.0692045440612 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241042132117 0.275328986314 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057685817727 0.0653680567796 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.