The best way to teach is to praise actions and ignore negative ones.
Unarguably, education plays the most fundamental role in every society’s development. Some people argue that praising the positive behavior leads to better upbringing, while many others claim the opposite. In my opinion appreciating the favorable actions can bring a better result in the process of both school education and home nurturing.
Praising promotes the motivation and morale of children. By acknowledging and rewarding them, parent or teacher can facilitate a positive atmosphere and intimate relationship with the child. Thus, improving their reception to teaching. Furthermore, many negative attributes during the young age are temporary. In fact many of them are just foibles, as many psychologists state, reminding the child of his or her wrongdoing just highlights his weakness and can lead to lack of self-confidence and more resistance to advice. Praising not only elevates the person’s self-esteem but also creates a better state of mind for absorbing further education.
Having said that, dispensing with some transgressions can result in serious issues. Children with too much negligence in their home works or those with abnormal behaviors need to be reminded or even punished for their misconducts. At schools lack of attention to negative behaviors can lead to havoc in the class and create undesirable environment for learning. Without enough attention, many children with predisposition to crimes and social misconducts can become criminals and delinquents in the near future. Thus, recognizing the negative actions among students and offsprings is necessary to preclude a society to give way to a generation with educational and behavioral deficiencies.
In conclusion, the benefits of praising the positive actions has undoubtedly numerous merits, and the priority should be given to rewarding and praising. However, teachers and parents should not neglect in their duties for identifying weaknesses in their pupils and children, and come prepared for rectifying any abnormal conducts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engagestudents in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of 79
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her can facilitate a positive atmosphere and intimate relationship with the child...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71854304636 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17187606505 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619205298013 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.742143165 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107580182092 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378568132294 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045184984936 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634439196149 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00593218766944 0.0667264976115 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.