The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The assertion that the best way is to praise postive acation and ignore the negaative ones is a controversial one. It would be helpful to examine specific cases in order to make the controversi-al arguement a bit more concrete. My points of contention with the speaker involves the fundamental objectives & nature of research as discussed below. On the one hand, praising the person will boost once confidence that would help them to achieve the task in an ease. On the other hand, ignoring the negative one would never help one to learn from mistake that had been made it in the past. However, in the final analysis, I believe that person should be praised for the postive action which he always made.
Firstly, praising for the postive action would make the person stress a bit lower as a result person would be in better condition mentally For example, when a fresher join the job he may not have advance knowledge of the system working so it’s he responsiblity of the team leader as well as the head of that department to constantly praised for all postive action.. Additionally, employee would get some inspiration to work even more harder. Finally, working harder by the employee would indirectly affecting the company itself.
Moreover, praising for the postive action would help in learning the new concept’s in an efficient as well as in an ease because it would make them more comfortable and would have a ignite in once self for the more learning. Specifically, when a person is depressed because they may be not as smart as the person around it’s university would depressed it if praising for all the small postive action which he did it in past would make him more comfortable and may start working harder. The result is, student may not fill depressed at the end of the day though he may not at the level of his colleague.
However Some might argue, if not learn from the negative action would never make a person repeat the mistake several time. Yet, repeating the simillar mistake several time wouldn’t make a person work more towards the concern. Others might site, ignoring the negative action would make one thing more superior than the other. However, feelin superior would make person work more to continue showing it’s superiority.
To sum up, there are arguments to be made for both sides, it is clear that there are greater advantages towards the praising for all the minute task and ignoring for the mistake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 66
- Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies—Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the buildin 59
- The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. Furthermore, there has be 63
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...onstantly praised for all postive action.. Additionally, employee would get some i...
^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
...would get some inspiration to work even more harder. Finally, working harder by the employe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...harder by the employee would indirectly affecting the company itself. Moreover, praisi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ke them more comfortable and would have a ignite in once self for the more learni...
^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ke them more comfortable and would have a ignite in once self for the more learning. Spe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'depress'
Suggestion: depress
...erson around it's university would depressed it if praising for all the small postiv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y not at the level of his colleague. However Some might argue, if not learn from the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...me. Yet, repeating the simillar mistake several time wouldn't make a person work more t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...he negative action would make one thing more superior than the other. However, feelin superior wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60504996887 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47380952381 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3901154278 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.588235294 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147959111131 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571272590641 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621765030581 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915406907002 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380178927138 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.