The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Ignoring negative actions and praising positives ones is not the best way to teach. When people think about their negative or unwanted actions’ consequences, they are able to become more understandable individuals. However, talking about negative actions should be in appropriate ways to make sure that there are no hurt feelings.
When people think about their negative actions, it will teach them to become a better person by considering their behavioral mistakes. For instance, a couple who never talks about their negative thoughts may lead to problems one day and as a result they may end up having a large argument with each other instead of improving their relationship. So, communication is a key in every relationship. If couples only mention their positive actions, there may be no corrections in improving their actions. On the other hand, a wife can tell her husband kindly that she dislikes him coming into the house with his dirty shoes.
Additionally, talking about negative actions with careful and positive language can encourage children to learn more. Consider a child who never cleans her room, but this child’s parent never mentions about their child room organization. So, this child may never consider her bad habit about not cleaning her room. An opposite example can be a child who always cleans her room because her mother discussed about room organization with her child. Surely, in the second example this child will be an organized person due to the reminder of negative action.
On the contrary, some people may believe that undesirable actions should go unnoticed to respect that individual. It can be true in specific situations. For instance, a mother should not punish her child if a child breaks a glass accidently, because it can result in a child feeling unwanted or isolated. In this case, it shows the importance of not blaming a child, but even in this situation, a mother can kindly remind her child to be more careful which does not harm her child’s feeling.
To improve individuals’ characteristics, having conversations about their negative actions in an appropriate way can be beneficial. Only praising positive action is not enough to help people to understand better.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-22 Celestina Asantewaa 50 view
2024-08-26 aaa111 33 view
2024-07-13 sepnkycehmqcodjefl 50 view
2024-04-17 guozhishan 50 view
2023-12-28 mei_unavailable 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Fariba.O :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...due to the reminder of negative action. On the contrary, some people may believe...
^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...versations about their negative actions in an appropriate way can be beneficial. Only praising positi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, for instance, talking about, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15193370166 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85026788993 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4872675858 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1578947368 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126685737302 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592919013394 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888650146194 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962231648969 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062821451511 0.0667264976115 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.