The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
According to this statement, it is advisable to praise positive actions and completely ignore negative actions when teaching others. Although I agree with the former half of this statement, the latter is no necessary true; therefore, this recommendation, as a whole, is not the best way to teach someone. When teaching someone—especially younger children—positive reinforcement is recommended. It encourages the student to act accordingly and follow instructions as well as foster trust in a healthy relationship. However, to completely ignore negative actions is dangerous because it can cause confusion and convolution. This can lead to immediate consequences that put people in dangerous situations or long-term consequences that develops into undesirable habits. Depending on the austerity of the situation, negative actions should not always be punished. That being said, it is critical that they are acknowledged and clarified. Unwanted actions should be clearly defined as negative.
An example of how such recommendation can be dangerous is in a setting where a risky or dangerous skill is being taught, such as driving. Driving seems like a mundane and common practice, but it is still a skill that requires our utmost attention and it involves the lives of many people—not just the driver. In such case, if the teacher does not note actions such as not stopping at a stop sign or accelerating over the speed limit, the student can easily put many other people in danger. This is a situation in which negative actions can be incredibly dangerous and must be immediately corrected. They do not need to be criticized nor ostracized, but they still need to be verbally explained about so such risky mistake are not replicated in the future.
Even in cases where the negative behavior might not have immediate or parlous consequences, it is equally important to clarify unwanted behaviors. For example, younger children often do stuff like biting their peers or going to the toilet at inappropriate places. This is due to lack of developed social skills. They are not intentional, but if someone does not teach the children that this is negative behavior, the young children might be confused and just continue replicating their negative actions, even without positive reinforcement simply because these actions are either enjoyable or convenient. They will continue to urinate whenever or wherever unless taught otherwise by society or their parents. They might continue to bite their peers because they think it is fun and without teeth, it does not yet cause harm. These two behaviors are not dangerous yet, but they can jeopardize the students in their future social interactions if they are not taught otherwise.
These are only two examples out of many others why it is significant to point out negative behavior. Communication is key in every relationship and interaction, including that of teacher and student. A teach should always give clear directions in a respectful way to their students. Although it is NOT always desirable to listen to reprehension or criticism, it is important. It is part of a person’s growth to understand their flaws and fix them in a healthy manner. In conclusion; it is not best to praise only positive actions and ignore negative ones. It is best to praise positive actions and correct negative actions through healthy and clear communication that can also support character growth.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative onesWrite a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup 58
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., is not the best way to teach someone. When teaching someone—especially younger chi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... otherwise by society or their parents. They might continue to bite their peers beca...
^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... including that of teacher and student. A teach should always give clear directions in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a respectful way" with adverb for "respectful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ach should always give clear directions in a respectful way to their students. Although it is NOT a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 454, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy manner" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to understand their flaws and fix them in a healthy manner. In conclusion; it is not best to prais...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2896.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26545454545 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10596600004 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481818181818 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 908.1 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9270357435 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16469082551 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488675680089 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063096830475 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106462721359 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057149044727 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.