Children should not be forced by law to be educated by either public schools or home schooling if their parents do not wish them to be Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In d

Essay topics:

Children should not be forced by law to be educated by either public schools or home schooling if their parents do not wish them to be.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Education is the process by which children are taught different concepts to get them ready for their professional lives, and for an all-round brighter future. Many governments from around the world have made education compulsory for children, and have multiple laws pertaining to public schools and home schooling. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with the prompt's claim of making education optional for children, at their parents' discretion. One may argue that people have a 'right' to education, as opposed to a 'duty,' and must, thus, be optional. However, this argument is baseless. There are three main points to consider when refuting this claim and taking a stand on education.

To begin, it would be in a government's best interests to make education mandatory. Why is this so? The reason is pretty straightforward: Governments aim to ensure the welfare of their people, and for a strong economy. If a government were to make education optional, children who are not schooled or educated are more likely to not get high-paying, or even average-paying jobs. If a country's workforce is uneducated, its people would have to resort to unskilled or low-skill jobs; the economy would not prosper as it would with an educated populace. Hence, to ensure a booming economy, a government would be incorrect to not to pursue literacy among its people. In fact, multiple research studies have observed the correlation between the illiteracy and unemployment. But does this mean that education should be pursued only due to the potential value for the economy?

One must also consider the possible socio-economic effects of not educating children. When the youth of poorer communities are educated, they are able to climb the rungs of the social ladder, and help their communities gain much-needed wealth and resources. Take the example of Indian villages: Of the economically weaker villages, the ones whose conditions improved were the ones who educated their young. This is, in itself, proof of the positive socio-economic effects of education. Another related thing to consider is the recent technological advancements that have been leading to a gradual decline in unskilled or low-skill job openings. Uneducated people would be hard hit by this if the very jobs that they learnt were taken over by Artificial Intelligence or robots. Considering all these aspects, would it be worth it to allow parents to not give their child an education? After all, it would even be beneficial to the family's economic condition, in a lot of cases.

Finally, if a parent were to not send their child to school (or home-school them), then is it really in the child's best interests? It is important to remember that children are incapable of huge decisions, since they are yet to learn the ways the world, the economy, and the society work. If they are not sent to school, then it would be an infringement on a child's potential, and on their inability to consent when it comes to such issues. If such a child, after growing up, despises their parents for not sending them to school, or regrets not getting an education themselves, they cannot reverse time; it is better to be educated young and open up all opportunities, than to stay uneducated and struggle afterwards.

In conclusion, I mostly disagree with the claim provided, since it is in the entire community's best interest that children are educated and literate. Any cases where children do not go to school would lead to a hardship-laden career life, and a delay in their studies and literacy. One may argue that the prompt is true since parents should be able to send their children to private school, but this is beyond the point, since there is nowhere an implication that, if the prompt were true, the parents would still educate their children.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-08 Technoblade 66 view
2020-05-05 elisabetta_fedele 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Technoblade :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a government' or simply 'governments'?
Suggestion: a government; governments
... education. To begin, it would be in a governments best interests to make education mandat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 85, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'communitys the best'.
Suggestion: communitys the best
...aim provided, since it is in the entire communitys best interest that children are educated and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, really, so, still, then, thus, after all, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.5258426966 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3173.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 631.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02852614897 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01195704033 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85518813328 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 312.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494453248811 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 990.9 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 14.0 3.10617977528 451% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7325831625 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.413793103 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7586206897 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27586206897 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285902885436 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075859981606 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560787604599 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176782909991 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354716305861 0.0667264976115 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.