Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
Leadership is crucial to the success of the enterprise. Once a company has a good leader, it is like having a lighthouse in the dark, and a ship with a helmsman. The prosperity of the enterprise is closely related to the talent of the leader, so the author believes that the important way for all enterprises to succeed is to replace the new leader. And concludes that, in any industry, the authority should step down after five years.
Indeed, leaders are very important to the development of the company. They not only need to take charge of the company's planning, but also bring in the right talents in a timely manner, so that the company or the collective can survive for a long time. For instance, the famous leader, Steve jobs, has made a great contribution to the company and the spirit of excellence in the product, which is the foundation for the company to become the leading enterprise of electronic products. And former President Barack Obama, whose leadership of the United States has made the United States more rapid and powerful, and his seriousness and charisma about education have deeply affected everyone, he even affected me who was watching his speech over the Internet halfway across the globe.
That said, the premise of the above argument is that it is built on leaders who are very talented, and that there are no other factors that lead to failure. However, this assumption may be wrong. First of all, the new leader who provided by the author’s opinion in the reason above is not necessarily a good leader. it is easily for us to conclude that the new leadership often bring negative impact even resistance to the enterprise due to lack of experience and progress by the so-called fact that "practice makes perfect". Secondly, not all companies need a change of leadership to reach the goal of successful, since they are already likely to have a very good leadership. The only reason of the company’s eruption is likely because the enterprise is under the circumstances of economic crisis. So, simply thinking that the success of all businesses requires new leaders is one-sided and inadequate.
In addition, it is not sufficient to assume that leaders of all industries should step down after five years by simply believing that new leaders are needed. First of all, it is not appropriate to apply this conclusion to all industries. As the saying goes, medicine against the disease. Each industry has its own peculiarities, for example, in the government, the President's five-year election is considered. But in the food industry, good chefs should not have a five-year term, because they need enough time to train new chefs. Therefore, it is worth discussing the statement about five years. And more importantly, it is unreasonable to think that leaders must step down after five years. If the leader of the administration has managed to keep the firm under control, and has been well liked by his staff, it would be necessary for him or her to stay in position.
In general, simply think that the success of any industry needs to be a new leader is one-sided, and it is untenable for all industry leaders to step down in five years. Although leadership is closely related to the enterprise, the success of the enterprise is far more than that of the leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-20 | Andrea Qin | 66 | view |
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five yearsReason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadershipwrite a response in which you discuss the exten 66
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live then Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp’s current headquarters. Moreover, 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 43
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 70
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng, but also bring in the right talents in a timely manner, so that the company or the collective ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...above is not necessarily a good leader. it is easily for us to conclude that the n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2760.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 564.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82064726676 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464539007092 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.9 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.978868471 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.56 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.56 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16566578993 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531739364366 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595532289431 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116218685685 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565249254882 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.