Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The claim and the reason given for this claim are compelling, since only defending an idea against all possible disapproval and convincing those who have contrasting perspective will indeed show us the tested merit and value of this idea.
An argument is a statement based on reasons and evidence that act to support it. If an argument is able to convince someone with a contrasting point of view, it would prove that the reasons and evidence that support the argument are strong enough and cogent. For example, when someone convince a vegan that this kind of diet could be harmful and it is not necessarily healthier based on reliable researches, such as one that utilized a sample comparing identical twins into a vegan and normal diet for twelve weeks. This study proved that veganism could change human body and cause a reduction of muscular mass, sexual appetite and body self-defense or general immunity. Furthermore, causing an increase of tiredness and irritability.
Moreover, when we have to defend an idea against possible flaws and divergent views and we are able to surpass all of it, it shows us the excellent value of that idea. This is because it proves that the idea is plausible. However, if the logic of the argument is invalid or unsound it does not make a cogent case that will convince others. For instance, utilizing the given study we could defend the idea that although veganism could diminish the diabetes risk and cholesterol levels, it would impair and affect the human body negatively based on the reliable results of the study. This shows the value of the argument that vegan diet could be harmful and it is not necessarily healthier.
To sum up, the argument´s ability to convince someone with distinct point of view is the best way to measure its plausibility, since developing reasons and a cogent reasoning to support this view against contrasting ones will prove the great value of this argument.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-05 | sunnyojh | 66 | view |
2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
2023-04-06 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
2023-01-21 | Pranav Lohote | 50 | view |
2022-11-02 | ljh5034 | 66 | view |
- 2) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 61
- 3)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teachers ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 327 350
No. of Characters: 1576 1500
No. of Different Words: 155 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.252 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.82 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.545 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.241 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.365 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.567 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5