Claim: The best way to teach is to praise positive and ignore the negative actions
Teaching people can be one of the most difficult yet satisfying task anyone can take up for the betterment of the society. Here the topic suggests that praising the positive actions and ignoring the negative ones can be one of the methods to investigate for teaching people. Personally, I completely agree with the first half of the statement, but the second part is what makes me doubt accepting the theory as a whole. Undisputedly positive reinforcement can help any community strive for a safer, happier, and better future but we cannot discount the fact that just blanket ignoring of the negative comments can backfire towards our growth in totality. Thus, meanwhile while I agree with initial part of the approach, I don’t fully agree with the “all or nothing” impression that it gives.
Firstly, in our society the need of being liked and accepted by people is very high among all age groups, genders etc. So, when the people around you or especially any authority starts to reward positive actions, that can certainly drive people to tend to repeat those actions for the praise. Rewarding good behaviour can also sometimes work as backhand reward to people who usually aren’t receptive to authoritarian figures. For example, in a classroom setting, if the teacher starts rewarding students to maintain decorum or raise hand when they speak, this will give those students an incentive(recognition and respect among peers) to act politely. Another good example for this can be the sports leagues across the world. While all the athletes reaching such levels are great among their own rights, rewards for the most amount of goals, the best goal, the best bowling average etc can serve as a good motivation for them to give it their all. This also helps create a sense of positive competitiveness among the players, helping them to push further out of their comfort zones.
Secondly, we should also talk emotional and psychological aspects of positive reinforcement as well. The praise received after a positive task will also kick in a dopamine release by our brain, making us feel with a sense of accomplishments. This uplifts your mood and tends to bring in positive thoughts furthermore incentivizing you act with positive actions. There are many studies as well that show that praises usually keep the morale high among employees, students or any other hierarchy level relationships. It motivates people to keep faith in the system and makes them give their all for their jobs.
Even though the first half of the statement has many positive aspects to make you consider it, but that can be done only if we are aware of the shortcomings of the second half of the sentence. The ignoring of the negative actions can and should be done depending upon the intensity of the harm that can be inflicted by the action. For example, reimagine a school scene. Imagine a situation where a few students are talking over the teacher and causing a hubbub in the classroom for a few jokes and little attention, here in this “low danger situation” ignoring them is the best decision, and by doing that the instructor will be teaching them a lesson. On the other hand, assume a few students are playing around with harmful chemicals in the lab or bullying another, here the teacher should intervene and castigate them. Before concluding, today as we live in the age of social media,thus an example of doing more than just ignoring negative actions should be more than necessary. Say you post a photo on an app, and there are a few people who come in and write vile comments about you or your loved ones. Ignoring them might work for you, but what if they land up in the comments of a person who cannot take it? Hence reprimanding such actions based on the severity of the actions is a necessity in order to teach people well.
In conclusion, however good the plan to positively appraise and accolade the good deeds, we cannot blatantly ignore the negative ones. Pointing them out, helping them correct them, and forgiving them might be a more fruitful path towards actually teaching them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 66
- Claim The best way to teach is to praise positive and ignore the negative actions 16
- All the parents should require to volunteer time at their children s school Write a response in which you can discuss the extent to which you agree and disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 66
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 57
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 885, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , thus
...ay as we live in the age of social media,thus an example of doing more than just igno...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...omments of a person who cannot take it? Hence reprimanding such actions based on the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3399.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 696.0 442.535393258 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88362068966 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13632280105 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65418288709 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 335.0 215.323595506 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48132183908 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1058.4 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1806303594 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.392857143 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214297760221 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600273862159 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699511354845 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126712096829 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470676682873 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.