Claim: Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students.
Reason: College students — like people in general — prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Colleges and universities provide courses which pursue by the student to acquire knowledge from the well-qualified person, and then college and university validate student’s education, to make them ready for the outside world. The college and university should provide a variety of subjects from a different branch of the field. As it’s the era of the next generation, the industry expects more from the student. To fulfill it the university should provide elective courses rather than removing it from the curriculum.
The university should provide elective courses as per students' choice rather than forcing them to apply for one specific direction. By doing that, the student may dislike the subject and end up getting fewer marks in the final exam. The student should have the independence to select their elective item, which helps them to become profound in that subject. Let me give an example of my university structure: Our university give us to choose many elective topics, student is very excited to choose one of them. By doing that, the university not only helps the student to select their choice of elective but also they maintained an interest in the study. And at the end of the semester, student are very happy to give the exam of their own selected subject, which thrives the overall performance of the student.
Moreover, why university wants to stop a student from choosing their subject, is there any problem related to the maintained record of the student or due to lack of teaching staff or due to difficulty arranging exam of elective subjects. This is all management levels of problem, which can be solved by hiring an excellent management staff and adding teaching staff in the university. But to stop student from selecting their elective subject will affect the longterm image of the university. This small investment in the university will give the university excellent returns.
Also, generalizations student is not god things, and the university should understand that every student is different have different ability to understand the subject. The university doesn’t have any right to interfere with that.
In conclusion: Although The university and college have the authority to change syllabus, they can’t get abundant the decision making of students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | natlaixd | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | mankubisht | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Gaurav Singla | 50 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who can not afford the tuition. 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionateinterest in commonplace things. 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 58
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27642276423 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80922251031 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485094850949 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8079336142 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.529411765 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292994704175 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108923401287 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08129216598 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164574315647 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798551835429 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.