The modern world cities reflect upon the various aspects of society and its development. The prompt addresses this topic by accentuating that a study of major cities can provide lots of information regarding their characteristics. I mostly agree with this position for two reasons outlined below. However, I do believe that leaving out the minor cities completely might not be a very efficacious idea.
Firstly, most people migrate from small towns and cities to the nearby major cities in search of jobs. This makes the cities rich with different cultures, customs, and characteristics. For example, the city of Delhi has different types of people - from high class, aristocratic people to the migrant daily-wage laborers from the villages situated in the vicinity of Delhi. Likewise, the city of Mumbai, which is one of the other largest cities in India, is highly populated with a protean population. Such a varied population can help a lot in comprehending the characteristics of a society emphatically. Thus, the major cities comprising of a large number of people from different regions and cultures could be very helpful in analyzing the characteristics of a society in the best possible way.
Secondly, a majority of the people in the cities are quite learned individuals who could express their feelings and deliver their wisdom if and when asked about their opinion on the given topic. For instance, educated people would truly understand the purpose of the survey and try to answer the questions in the most logical way. The poor and uneducated people in the villages and small cities, on the other hand, could find it hard to comprehend the questions. In addition, not only can an educated person in a large city express his or her beliefs with cogency but also help the uneducated or poor individuals(like house helps, daily wage workers) to express themselves in an unequivocal manner. Hence, this might make the entire process of understanding the tropes prevalent among different classes of society quite uninvolved. Thus, surveying the people in large cities could bring in a more lucid understanding of its features.
However, I do concede that leaving out the small cities and villages completely might not be extremely beneficial. For example, though the people in large cities communicate with clarity, it cannot be said for true if they still remember what they felt when they used to live in villages or small towns a few decades back. This could result in a flawed interpretation of the cultures prevalent in small cities and towns.
In conclusion, the major cities can provide tons of information regarding the characteristics of a society. However, leaving the small cities and villages out of the picture might not serve very well.
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation 039 s cultural traditions are preserved and generated 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...ty emphatically. Thus, the major cities comprising of a large number of people from different...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y. Thus, the major cities comprising of a large number of people from different regions and cultu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unequivocal manner" with adverb for "unequivocal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...aily wage workers to express themselves in an unequivocal manner. Hence, this might make the entire proc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13747228381 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89540411437 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490022172949 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9877282335 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4761904762 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61904761905 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192525288359 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675693989295 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447067214932 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124971758351 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215739517223 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.