Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
The author of this statement claims that people can not consider a woman or man as a hero for long time. However, others have the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the answer is different in various conditions. I take this position on account for the following reasons.
To illustrate my position, let us to take a look on why some people think that a person cannot be hero for long time. In fact, some hero become famous because of the special talent, while after a period time another person can have a better talent than them. Furthermore, people pay more attention on new hero, and after sooner or later old hero will be forgotten. In addition, changing generation can be another factor in this trend. I think that a small example can give some light. Twenty years ago people like to listen to classical music and they like singers, who sing with this methods. However, the scenario is changed for future generation, and they tend more to listen to pop music. Hence, it is quite normal that they need new idol in the music.
A further point we must consider is that some hero gain their fame by making false imagine of themselves. Nevertheless, increasing people’s knowledge causes they detect the fact.
In contrast, history is witnessing a great people that they make great changes, so we cannot forget them any time. I think that there is not a better example than Elbert Einstein, who was a great scientist in physic. Elbert Einstein, the father of relativity, had several significant scientific works in this field study, so that many of modern scientists use his works for their researches. So, his works causes people remember him as a hero forever.
All above evidence supports this undeniable fact that a person can be hero forever if his achievements were permanent. Admittedly, passing time causes some hero who has not affect the society significantly, will be forget.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Morienta | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Nico Lingga | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | shivamchug | 54 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 41
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-17:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
- The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your answer. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ic and they like singers, who sing with this methods. However, the scenario is chang...
^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'affected'.
Suggestion: affected
...ssing time causes some hero who has not affect the society significantly, will be forg...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'while', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234666666667 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.149333333333 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0906666666667 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.048 0.0497285424764 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0613333333333 0.0444667217837 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.12 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0266666666667 0.0406280797675 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61051763937 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016 0.030933414821 52% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.104 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0266666666667 0.0249443105267 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106666666667 0.0148568991511 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1906.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 327.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82874617737 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348623853211 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.211009174312 0.280924506359 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.152905198777 0.200843997647 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103975535168 0.132149295362 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61051763937 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 219.290929204 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574923547401 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 63.4155874147 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.35 23.380412469 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1510108706 59.4972553346 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3 141.124799967 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.35 23.380412469 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.674092028746 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 37.4509174312 51.4728631049 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.47422680412 1.64882698954 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25837736064 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107985653472 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0886060931335 0.077325440228 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.463322339514 0.547984918172 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123443847774 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834876373736 0.161403998019 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508391317359 0.0892212321368 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.172793506591 0.385218514788 45% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0417473436889 0.0692045440612 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14710489989 0.275328986314 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518984830243 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.