Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
The author infers that nowadays it is impossible for one to be regarded as hero in that media scrutiny will finally destroys one's reputation. Indeed along with development in thoroughness of media, people are likely to encounter so-called heroes' misbehaviors or mistakes by media. However, I disagree with the claim because there are some possible cases of maintaining one's fame regardless of media's scrutiny. What is more, media can also disseminate positive reports which can exalt one's reputation rather than diminishing.
Boost in velocity and easier assess to media makes easier to diminish one's reputation. To illustrate, Barry Bonds, who was a legendary baseball player was regarded as hero because of his exceptional performance. However as the fact that he took illegal medicine, probably strengthen his power and performance, was divulged by media, his fame as superior baseball could not last long and he fell short of 'Hall of Fame'. Likewise Ricky Malhotra, a professor in medicine department was also respected as profound researcher because of his superior paper. However, the fact that the paper's results were artificially manipulated was disclosed by the media and his fame as great scientist also fell correspondingly. Without those. there are many too many examples whose reputation harshly plummeted after media had revealed their misbehaviors and mistakes.
However, Mistakes and misbehaviors which everyone can make do not always entail destroy in one's reputation. Rather, people seem to distinguish between heroes' mistake from ones that are related to their quality and ones that are not. To illustrate, consider Tiger Woods, a celebrated golf player. The media has divulged his adultery and undesirable relationships with female and as a result people do not treat his life as ideal. However, unlike Barry Bonds or Ricky Malhotra whose misbehaviors were directly related to their performance, his superior golf performance was not related to his misbehaviors and his reputation as golf player is still remaining. What is more, he is allowed to enter 'Hall of Fame' in 2021. Likewise, it is still possible for someone to be treated as hero even if he/she had misbehaved if their misbehaviors were not related to their essence.
Finally, we should also consider that media can cause positive affect regarding one's fame. Not only negative reports but positive reports also be are disseminated by medias. For example, consider Steve Jobs who was a leader of Apple. Thorough investigation about his character which was conducted by media provided people an opportunity to understand his attractive and charming business philosophy such as encourage innovation than obsolete success or being not afraid of fail, etc. As a result, his reputation as well-performed business became more stable than before. Likewise, Bill Gates, who was a leader of Microsoft was also helped by media exalting his fame. Not only are his tremendous wealth and success available in the newspaper, but his great amount of donation and his charitable institution are also easily assessed by media.
In conclusion, even though I concede that media scrutiny can easily divulge and disseminate misbehaviors conducted by so-called 'heroes' and correspondingly destroy their reputations, I disagree with the claim based on above mentioned reasons. There are still many super heroes who keep their fame and honor regardless of media's thoroughness.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements It is better to study alone than in a group Use specific reasons and examples to support your oppinion 73
- Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact on our customers In fact only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating tha 68
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'destroy'
Suggestion: destroy
...ero in that media scrutiny will finally destroys ones reputation. Indeed along with deve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...at media scrutiny will finally destroys ones reputation. Indeed along with developme...
^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... will finally destroys ones reputation. Indeed along with development in thoroughness ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... are some possible cases of maintaining ones fame regardless of medias scrutiny. Wha...
^^^^
Line 1, column 485, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...minate positive reports which can exalt ones reputation rather than diminishing. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ssess to media makes easier to diminish ones reputation. To illustrate, Barry Bonds,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...because of his exceptional performance. However as the fact that he took illegal medici...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...long and he fell short of Hall of Fame. Likewise Ricky Malhotra, a professor in medicine...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...so fell correspondingly. Without those. there are many too many examples whose reputa...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...an make do not always entail destroy in ones reputation. Rather, people seem to dist...
^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ds, a celebrated golf player. The media has divulged his adultery and undesirable r...
^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...dia can cause positive affect regarding ones fame. Not only negative reports but pos...
^^^^
Line 7, column 815, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and his charitable institution are also easily assessed by media. In conclusi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, still, then, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2905.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40968342644 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93203674365 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 951.3 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7035313236 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.730769231 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6538461538 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34615384615 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158476581727 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508002238077 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452905758065 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11024591339 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495149572759 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.