Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The claim suggests tha nowadays it is impossible for a living man or woman to be considered as a hero in a society. A hero can be defined as a person who contributes to the prosperity of the society. The reason for this claim is that the reputation of any person can be destroyed by the aggressive inspection of media in the present society. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the claim for the following two reasons.
In the current society with the unbelievable technological advancement,each action of a persn can be easily accesible to the entire world by one click which has made easieror any peson to be declared as hero overnight. But there comes media who investigates those actions as well as the person’s personal life, past deeds and expose them to the general if there is any problematic action done by that person. Even if a person become hero for the society by actually performing good deeds, he can be judged or ridiculed for any misunderstanding, mistakes of his or his family. Consequently, it has become so hard for a person to become a hero or remain hero to the people of the society even he has done a lot due to excessive inspection of media which also make people change their minds.
There is also another scenario where media is used to establish a propaganda and turn the hero into a villain for the society by his opponents. Nowadays, media channels are mostly owned by powerful people who used media to manipulate people, even social media content circulation is not free from any influence. For instance, There was a mayor in a city who worked very hard and changed the entire look of the city to the point that people started worshiping him as their hero. He was beingly widely praised for good deeds but his tasks were eyesore for the people who were greedy and opportunist and not interested in public welfare. They used their power and dragged him into a scandal relating money which ruined his reputation and cost him losing the respect of people. So, the involvement of media for good or bad can turn a hero into nothing with their actions.
However, it is also possible for a person to be hero for a group of people despite media involvement as he gained their trust. He could hated by some but a real hero for his people. For example, there are many leaders, writers, celebrities, politicians etc. are considered hero for a part of people in the society though their personal lives and past is continuously getting criticized. But becoming legendary people like we used to have in past has become entirely impossible as human beings cannot be perfect and this notion is being continuously used my media by digging information about anyone’s life and criticize his through it.
In conclusion, in such days of technological advancements when it is so easy to survey on people’s each action or going around people and collect personal details has made impossible to a person to be considered as hero for the society. Though a person don’t need to be a hero to the entire society, he can continue his good deeds which will obviously gain him some people who will worship him as over inspection of media is not always justified.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , each
...e unbelievable technological advancement,each action of a persn can be easily accesib...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o for the society by actually performing good deeds, he can be judged or ridicule...
^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'hate'
Suggestion: hate
...ment as he gained their trust. He could hated by some but a real hero for his people....
^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough it. In conclusion, in such days of technological advancements when it is so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, so, well, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2620.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 558.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69534050179 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74022717182 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442652329749 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8143847913 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.761904762 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253887590973 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951957384716 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423185046365 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168362319512 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424168562544 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.