Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Claiming an individual as a hero is a very subjective matter and a complex one. It is very difficult to define whether an individual should be represented as a hero or not. Here the statement claims that, it is no longer possible for the society to accept any individual as a hero because on the close observation by the media the reputation of that individual would diminished. I do not agree with the aforementioned claim and here are the few key factors to prove it.
First, a society would called or identify an individual as a hero if they have done something great in their field. The field could be anything from sports, education, research, politics, and many more. A society accepts an individual as a hero when they feel motivated from their work and it creats a sense of excitement in them. In cricket, for example, the opener batsmen of the Indian Cricket team Sachin Tendulkar, is often considered as a hero by many aspiring crickters. Sachin Tendulkar is also famous by the name of 'Master Blaster' due to his many records like hundred centuries in his carrer, one of the youngest player to play for the Indian team and many more.
Eventhough, Sachin Tendulkar has retired more than five years now, society still remembers him as a hero who help India to win the world cup. There are so many other examples in the course of history where people have considered an individual as a hero. If an individual is genuiene and truly loved by the society then any backlash on the reputation that individual would not bother the love given that individual by the society. For instance, the actor Shah Rukh Khan has come in media for many controversy topics, like hiting a staff member during an event. Even after such an event the reputation and the fan following which he has didn't reduce.
I am not dening that all the bad quality of an individual would be accepted by the society even if they are famous. If on a close scrutinity, it comes that the individual is wrong than the society would not forget him. For instance, Srikant a fast bolwer in the Indian team, who was also a member of 2011 world cup and he was also hail an hero by the society, as he contributed in wining the world cup, but when the news of his match fixing came, people were very angry with him. The society even banned him from playing cricket for life-time.
In conclusion, if an individual has good qualities and is geneuine then the society would accept the individual. Not denying, one mistake would take all the hard earn reputation away. It is a age of media where not a person is safe from the eyes of media and they reputaion depends on how it is represented.
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 58
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs 79
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assured until a musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'diminish'
Suggestion: diminish
...the reputation of that individual would diminished. I do not agree with the aforementioned...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'call'
Suggestion: call
...rs to prove it. First, a society would called or identify an individual as a hero if ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tion and the fan following which he has didnt reduce. I am not dening that all the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hailed'.
Suggestion: hailed
...ember of 2011 world cup and he was also hail an hero by the society, as he contribut...
^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... of 2011 world cup and he was also hail an hero by the society, as he contributed ...
^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ll the hard earn reputation away. It is a age of media where not a person is safe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56184486373 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56179511149 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48427672956 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6857627892 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.619047619 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7619047619 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159387330523 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541151678668 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401204350591 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099737780508 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050335502787 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.