Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
First of all, knowing about the past is a cost-effectiveness method to make effective decision-making today. That is, every decision making requires to spend time and allocate enough budget to conciliate invaluable information in the past and current. To explain more, when world health organization(WHO) want to estimate dangers of special disease in the unique are for the current and future status, they have to know the past status of that disease in that area. If the particular illness was limited to special seasons, population and particular area in the country this means that these patterns will be enduring for the next years. Therefore, by knowing the past status of unique diseases health official could make a best decision to hinder epidemic of that diseases by taking cheaper and quick preventive works such as immunization of susceptible peoples or improving environmental health. On the other hand, ignoring the past status of diseases leads to suffering more mortality and morbidity and all of these events impose innumerable costs on society.
Further, the existing distance could not prevent to link past and current events. To explain more, there are some archaic and valuable documented and undocumented information sources from the past which will be helpful in decision making today. Every society has own elite in terms of various fields such as art, science, philosophy, medicine, astronomy, which written their knowledge for future generations and research. For instance, Avicenna who was the prominent physician in the Persian empire collected his knowledge in various books such as “GANNON”. In this book, he explains the cause of the diseases according to the area and population. Until now, this book has been using in the famous university as textbooks in the medicine filed. Also, other physic scientists whose name is Albert Einstein created a famous” Rational Theory” that continues till now, and his theory was written and collected by his pupils to use for the next scholars.
Although using the past information could be a valuable source in decision making today, it also has own limitations. To clarify this point, some of the scientific theory which posited in the past has been refuted by most of today's’ connoisseurs. For instance, some expert said that all of the cancer is fateful and there is not an effective treatment for them, whereas today some type of cancers such as Brest and colon have been treating. Therefore, using that information will be fallacious for currents life.
In summary, while some people think that knowing about the past event could not be helpful in decision making, I disagree with this idea due to knowing past information is an economic and quick method for decision making today
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | vinithanavis | 58 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | Ghader | 66 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | Gh.Ne | 79 | view |
| 2018-11-08 | zamira7979@mail.ru | 66 | view |
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 73
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 89
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client."Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienc 39
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 73
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a national newspaper."Your recent article on corporate downsizing* in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
...That is, every decision making requires to spend time and allocate enough budget to conc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 685, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...e, by knowing the past status of unique diseases health official could make a best decis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 721, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...que diseases health official could make a best decision to hinder epidemic of tha...
^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...own limitations. To clarify this point, some of the scientific theory which posited in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rs. For instance, some expert said that all of the cancer is fateful and there is not an e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in summary, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24215246637 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85979493579 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517937219731 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4208986692 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267275131087 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092875020404 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867701400412 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190804586853 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680739877061 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.