College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Most college students, after graduation, apply to numerous industries, companies, organizations to advance their career and get a job. The claim that "Students should choose their field according to the availability of the jobs in that field", undermines some of the most important factors that guides the students to choose a field. Every student is an individual, and every individual is different than the other. Thus each and every student cannot possess same qualities, skills, and talents that are required for the job. Moreover, all individual cannot have same interests: some might be interested in sports, others in research work.
For instance, if this claim is to be hold true, and a student who is interested in some other field, but due to less avilable jobs takes up some other field. Then it is inevitably possible that he may not like work done in that field in the first place, and he may drop out of college which eradicates his future career. But, if he takes the field of his interest then he will atleast be interested in its studies, and, no matter what happens, if a student is motivated towards studies and does all the hard work, he will get the job one way or the other.
Further, if students are always encouraged to opt for fields in which jobs are more, then we might loose the valuable we could have got if that student opted for the field in which he is interested. A great example to this reasoning is, Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft. Had he been told to pusue the field in which jobs are greater, personal computers wouldn't be so quotodians and easy to use. Moreover, Gates further created the jobs in his field which lead others to take up this field.
One might think that every individual doesn't get job in a field in which jobs are less, and so they should choose the field that has abundant jobs. This statement, in itself, states that every individual isn't the same, as it states "everbody doesn't get job".
Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that though it looks like job is an important prospect in choice of field for a college student, instead they should base their choice more on interest rather than job availability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | christine_cui | 54 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | nikkk | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Saudamini Ghatge | 54 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Deepali24 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 58 | view |
- Do you think that television programs, movies, and video games have influenced on young people's behavior. 77
- TOEFL essay:A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment . Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay. 70
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...dual, and every individual is different than the other. Thus each and every student ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...individual is different than the other. Thus each and every student cannot possess s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...s in which jobs are more, then we might loose the valuable we could have got if that ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ch jobs are greater, personal computers wouldnt be so quotodians and easy to use. Moreo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... One might think that every individual doesnt get job in a field in which jobs are le...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...in itself, states that every individual isnt the same, as it states 'everbody d...
^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t the same, as it states 'everbody doesnt get job'. Thus, in conclusion,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76701570681 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59688634718 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.625370607 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4666666667 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300829212145 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111027796333 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760760745079 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18710056015 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370194436396 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.