College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than
the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
Many college students feel confused between choosing a major that is more likely to lead to better job prospects and choosing a major that they interested in. I recommend that one’s interests and talents should be the primary factor in deciding one’s field of study, since it is where the student’s passion lies in. Meanwhile, the information of related career prospects can also be a supplement in decision making.
First of all, a student’s interests drive heto explore deep in the subject and talents enable heto excel more easily. Without interests, one has no motivation to work hard on his subject; and without talents, one has to struggle with the onerous research works, which may further frustrate him. In universities, I often see students who study simply for passing exams. They copy others’ homework in order to submit it before deadline; or perhaps more egregiously, they cheat on exams so that they can earn a diploma, in spite of barely obtaining knowledge and learning professional skills. As a result, they could have at best average performance in the courses they choose, which negatively affect their employabilities subsequently. Therefore, student should not choose majors they are neither interested in nor good at, just because of the promised potentially lucrative jobs.
However, a student must also be aware of the unemployment rate of his chosen majors. If one chooses a subject that is interesting but unfortunately leads to very bleak jobs, he might suffer a lot after four years of hard work. For example, parents might tell children that they cannot get a job with an English degree, might advise them that a practical degree is the safe bet in a rough economy, might crack jokes about them working at Starbucks while writing a novel in the basement. This is quite hurtful for students who have passion in literature. For the majority of students who come from middle-class families or even poorer ones, it would be utterly cruel to encourage them to learn those esoteric Shakespeare’s works, while knowing that they might end up earning meager wages. Thus, it can be said that students should not choose subjects that might lead to unemployment and financial difficulties after graduation. This might seem in conflict with my first point.
In fact, the unemployment rates do not vary so extreme with majors that a student should weight it more heavily than interests and talents. This is because the job market is constantly changing and usually unpredictable as it can be affected by a myriad of factors, such as the development of related industry. Consider the computer science major. Ten years ago, the number of students choosing this major surged due to the booming computer industry; then suddenly this figure dropped because students were worried about outsourcing to distant regions as IT engineers; but now with students’ awareness of the potential of network and artificial intelligence, such number climbed up gradually again. If a student bases his major choice on job availability, he would be at a loss when this field changes fiercely after four years’ college study. It is even more insecure than following his interests and talents. For some students major in subjects with less job-specific skills, such as literature, they can double majors to land a job with the second major and wait until their dream jobs come.
In a final analysis, I would encourage students to pursue the major where their interests and talents lie in, rather than blindly going with the current job trend. As discussed above, interests and talents serve as the motivation that can guide a student to be diligent and persistent, and it is hard to foretell what kind of jobs will be profitable in the future. So I believe that keep chasing our dreams and we would lead a self-fulfilling life one day.
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather thanthe courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 66
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO40 integrated 90
- TPO34 integrated 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3264.0 2235.4752809 146% => OK
No of words: 635.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14015748031 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01988110783 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8525610588 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 336.0 215.323595506 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529133858268 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 996.3 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5994828935 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4230769231 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26923076923 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263327986009 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726011663634 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481354312375 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153683935442 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350529724971 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.