College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the college students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seems most likely to lead to jobs. Indisputably, I see that there are some positive viewpoints that make the student to take courses which can be useful to find a job in the future, one of them is there is no need to keep search for a job for a long time after the students are graduated from the university. Nevertheless, when the students keep chasing their dreams and study the subjects they loved to study, this will make them more creative and more effective in their jobs in the future. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that the students should take courses that likely lead to a job, and would argue that they should be encouraged to study what they like to study without taking in to consideration the need for getting a job quickly.
First of all, I see that the students should follow their dreams and keep going to what they interest for. I would like to point out that if someone want to be special and creative, he should think out of the box. To illustrate, let us look at the example of student who want to be a singer and he think that he has a good voice. In this circumstance, obviously he will be so successful if he didn’t give up and keep practicing to be a good singer, and this might need some time. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that the best way to be successful is be patient on what you want to be and climb the hill step after step.
Furthermore, if the students after they graduated were not patient and need to get a job quickly, they might have this job, but they will not be very happy in the future. Specifically, if I see that software engineers will be hired quickly, but I don’t love the programming, it’s not a good idea to take programming courses to take this job because I will not be so happy in the future. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that any one successful company needs to put the suitable person in the suitable place. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that the students should pursue subjects that they are interested in rather than taking courses to get a job.
Admittedly, getting a job in a place that don’t need creativity, it’s will be a good idea to take this job for specific period of time. This is true especially when it comes to places were need to use the physical ability to do the job. In addition, it’s will be a good idea if it’s was specified in a short period of time until finding the best position for the student in the future. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that taking courses to get a job is the best thing the students can do. Because, this might waste our time and may be unfocused on our real dream.
In conclusion, although it’s seems a good idea to think about how to get a job quickly, but this will lead to negative effects in the future on the performance of the student. As long as some measurements are performed, it’s a fact that everyone need to be on the suitable place to get the best result and the best performance. In fact, this can be extended to involve every thing in our life, so that we need to love what we do in order to be happy in our life.
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people’s efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 66
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people’s efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...would like to point out that if someone want to be special and creative, he should t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
... student who want to be a singer and he think that he has a good voice. In this circu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practicing being'.
Suggestion: practicing being
...sful if he didn't give up and keep practicing to be a good singer, and this might need some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...s that the best way to be successful is be patient on what you want to be and clim...
^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...d personal experience have told us that any one successful company needs to put the sui...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...good idea to take this job for specific period of time. This is true especially when it comes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...a if it's was specified in a short period of time until finding the best position for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 31.0 12.4196629213 250% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 69.0 33.0505617978 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2745.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 613.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4779771615 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97582523872 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56835787775 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.391517128874 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6400542278 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.714285714 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1904761905 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302676606619 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110921833384 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161634872639 0.0758088955206 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17866275314 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134520618291 0.0667264976115 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 12.1743820225 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.