Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Company should keep a track of its employee progress and also protect its resources. A good way to achieve this goal is by constantly monitoring its employees. Hence, company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence.
Most of the employees tend to misuse the resources provided by their organisations by using official e-mail for garrulous conversations, unnecessary distractions and discursive discussions. This can be eradicated by a constant monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence as this will enable employees to be more wary while using company resources and thereby confining their official e-mail correspondence to work and also enabling them to be more fecund.
This constant monitoring can also help save resources other than time such as storage. Most companies use cloud based storage, they purchase enormous storage capacity for the functioning of the organisation. E-mails also take up some of this space and hence, trivial issues can occupy space that can be used for the company development. Hence, constant monitoring can qualify the use of resources such as time and system capacity.
This routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence will also help to understand the tasks taken up by the employees and the status of its development. Employees in superior positions can also be updated about the projects assigned to the employees under them. This will help all the employees to stay informed about the projects and since, employees are furnished with the status of projects, co-operation among the team mates increases and therefore the productivity increases.
There are also some drawbacks to this monitoring. Since, there are some restrictions placed on the usage of official e-mail, people might resort to other means of communication. This can be hazardous to the company productivity as people will get discursive and loose focus on the main work.
This can also be considered as an invasion of employees privacy. Employees may feel distrusted and there by become less fecund.
Hence, although this monitoring of employee e-mails has some drawbacks, overall effect of this monitoring can be beneficial to an organisation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 58 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | asm01 | 83 | view |
| 2022-06-27 | Nalu00 | 75 | view |
- Torreya Taxifolia tree decline and migration 73
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 93
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 71
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48245614035 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06773085634 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470760233918 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.1062979234 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323725626772 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119633182183 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106074973575 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164217810808 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881982731749 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.