Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
According to the passage, the author believes that a firm should regularly check their employee's emails. The author assumes that reforming such a policy could make the employee more productive and the company wouldn't have to face the possible risks of a lawsuit.
The author in this argument sounds logical; if the employee's work and emails are kept under supervision, then the employee will be more focused and productive. The employee would not get distracted from his work, especially when he knows that he is being monitored. Also, since the employee is being supervised, the risk of lawsuits would not occur just because of a single employee. That is, one employee's wrong doing wouldn't affect the company's reputation. This is due to the fact that the emails and other work are going through various levels of supervision.
However, the authors states that creating such a policy would save precious time. This could not necessarily be true because time spent in supervising can also be posited as time wasted.
Also, in gainsay to the author's argument is that the employees of the institution wouldn't be very happy of such a policy. A policy such as this would reduce the freedom and free will of the employee to a great extent. Such a policy could also be misconstrued by the employee as 'lack of trust'. So before making any decisions, it is necessary to ask all the employees' opinion about such a policy. Such a policy would also limit the creativity of the employee. It can also be considered a breach in integrity.
All in all, it would be suffice to say that such a policy has its own merits and demerits. However, it could be considered that such a policy could lead to employee dissatisfaction but ultimately lead to the company's prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 23
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.Write a response in which you di 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...mployee more productive and the company wouldnt have to face the possible risks of a la...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ee will be more focused and productive. The employee would not get distracted from ...
^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one employee', 'an employee', or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: one employee; an employee; employees
... because of a single employee. That is, one employees wrong doing wouldnt affect the companys...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...yee. That is, one employees wrong doing wouldnt affect the companys reputation. This is...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...me wasted. Also, in gainsay to the authors argument is that the employees of the i...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 83, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s that the employees of the institution wouldnt be very happy of such a policy. A polic...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...cisions, it is necessary to ask all the employees opinion about such a policy. Such a pol...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8903654485 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67398316754 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495016611296 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5274196656 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5882352941 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184108083544 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720138070109 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398474820693 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116274442423 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297880901941 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.