The content of a message matter more than how it is delivered. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Messages are statements that may contain vital information, such as in the circumstances faced by spies who are required to deliver necessary information to whom they serve, or in the case of orators, whose speeches greatly influence the audience. The way that messages are delivered impacts the concerned parties that are supposed to receive them. However, the content of the message itself determines the subsequent response and actions that will be taken after the message is delivered, which is more important.
Spies are specially trained covert agents who can easily blend into foreign crowds and extract information about the concerned place or person they are supposed to spy upon. Their aim is to somehow deliver the collected information, by one form or the other, irrespective of the mode of deliverence of the messages. In medieval times, spies often used pigeons to deliver their messages. In modern times, where technology has grown to a large extent, they use means of secure, anonymous and encrypted message networks to make sure that their messages reach the concerned parties safely. It can be concluded that the messages that are delivered themselves play a more important role than how they are delivered. Only if the information is received at the right place and the right time, prompt actions and decisions can be made.
In educational environments such as schools and colleges, teachers and lecturers play an important role in passing their knowledge to their students. What they teach proves to be more important than how it is taught. The mode of interaction between the teachers and students can be offline as well as online. Students have adapted to online learning environments, especially after the recent pandemic, and thus they can learn as effectively as in an interactive offline environment. It can be concluded that the content that the students learn are more important than how they learn it.
However, a different perspective comes into picture in the case of orators delivering powerful speeches to their audience. Often the messages that are conveyed in this environment is simple and starightforward. But the way in which they are delivered greatly influences the mood and the motivation of audience. Orators use their speech prowess to steer their audience in however ways they want, be it to spread hatred, patriotism or even nationalism. Thus, the way of conveying a message has a higher weightage than the messages themselves in this case.
In most cases, it is evident that the content of messages that are delivered in various scenarios prove to be more important than the way in which they are delivered. Messages having minimal or unimportant content are useless even when they are delivered in various ways. The content factor of a message thus decides its overall importance, and people should consider this viewpoint and not spend their time and resources in determining how to deliver these messages to create the highest impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-25 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | hhj | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- The content of a message matter more than how it is delivered Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons and or e 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, such as, as well as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19008264463 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79464737634 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464876033058 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1551860377 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31818181818 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20202846588 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719904661006 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648638323281 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130168577478 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472074095445 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.