Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Judgement of any types of work get more importance when it comes from pundit of that field. I am agree with this claim because judgement mostly depends on expert's decision.
Doctors are busy with their patients all time. When a critical patient has been come in hospital , patients well-wisher wants to consult with expert doctors for his/her better treatment. A novice doctor can't make better decision in critical case.
In industry, owner's always has met with experts of this field than newcomer of that field because owner's know expert make better decision for the betterment of industry
Many government corporation hire experienced worker of that field for consultancy. They value of experience of pundit because when you don't know how to run this work your judgement does not get any stance. A random guy's decision does not make any sense in critical situation.
However, in many case giving judgement does not need any type of expertise.Any person give their opinion. sometimes his/her judgement worked very well in that field.
Judgement depends on impacts who give this decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 33
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The "let it burn" policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 33
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...t comes from pundit of that field. I am agree with this claim because judgement mostl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...itical patient has been come in hospital , patients well-wisher wants to consult w...
^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s/her better treatment. A novice doctor cant make better decision in critical case. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f experience of pundit because when you dont know how to run this work your judgemen...
^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Any
...ent does not need any type of expertise.Any person give their opinion. sometimes hi...
^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sometimes
...xpertise.Any person give their opinion. sometimes his/her judgement worked very well in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 19.5258426966 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 14.8657303371 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 2235.4752809 41% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 177.0 442.535393258 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20338983051 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.55969084622 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5291134008 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 215.323595506 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 704.065955056 40% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.7339739632 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7272727273 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214159270031 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082067545017 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453611988543 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109659246174 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053746856393 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 100.480337079 38% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.