Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The given statement points out the fact that the critical judgment of work made by an expert in some field would be valuable in some time, which I do accept. However, I cannot agree with the claim as a whole due to the "all or nothing" perspective that the judgment of normal people is of little use. Here are some reasons.
First of all, the claim reveals that the judgment of an expert is more meaningful and valuable. Admittedly, this is certainly reasonable because the expert my grasp much more professional knowledge and working experience in the field. For example, the winner of the Nobel Prize is determined by professors from different top universities or institutes. As a result, when the work refers to something of the high profession and inaccessible for normal people, the claim is certainly reasonable.
whereas, this partial rationality cannot change the overall incorrectness, because in most cases, the work serves people and ought to be judged by people, especially in most fields related to our daily life. For instance, there is a well-known website called Douban in China. The function of it is to provide people with a platform to rate TV shows, movies, books, etc. Although the judges are not famous writers, movie directors or experts in art and literature, we all consider the grade or rate on the website as a golden rule of work.
To sum up, in the original statement, there is indeed a reasonable point that critical judgment of work in some professional fields cannot be considered valuable if it does not come from an expert in that field. While it cannot be regarded as fully persuasive since most of the work in the world serve in our daily life should and sometimes must be judged by common people. Actually, I disagree with the claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 68
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- TPO 47 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...the claim is certainly reasonable. whereas, this partial rationality cannot change...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, in most cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89836065574 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74795567902 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547540983607 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6006166461 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.21951772744 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240064418629 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790915818809 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712042578092 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148686363359 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586455106262 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.