Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement contends that the critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. It is true that several fields are estimated mostly, sometimes wholly by experts, but there are some fields that has less proportion to the experts.
If the field is related to rationality of humanity, the importance of experts for the critical judgment of the work goes skyrocketing. Understanding the work of precise and accurate fields essentially requires gigantic amount of times and effort and estimating it would require even more. On those fields, it would be hilarious the judgment on non-experts. Think about Novel prizes’ achievements that is awarded every year. All the eminent physicists and biologists and other scientists give an applause to its greatness but to laymen there are so complicated and sophisticated to understand.
On the other hand, when the field is related to emotion of humanity, the importance of the work decreased. Emotion is something that the humanity have inherently and it is not difficult to depend whether the work is good or bad. When the people listen to pop music, they could decide whether it is a good music or not just by listening it. The expert would examine and tell it is not good because its codes are simple and the lyrics are boring, but if the audience thinks it is good then it could gain huge popularity and reputation.
The proponents of the statement will assert that on the field of emotion, judgment of the expert is also important. For instance, when the musician should play the highest note and the lowest note simultaneously, one would just spread their arms and play it. However, when the same thing is done by a violin, the musician should move both hands as quickly as possible. Though it would be same for the audience. The violinist should get higher reputation.
However, it is not the main principle of critical judgment whether the required skill of the work is complicated, but it is whether helpful to the humanity. All the study are eventually for the matured and flourished humanity. even though the violinist have more higher skills, if the audience think the pianist is better, the violinist should try other composed script.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- a nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning. 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 70
- Several factors indicate that KNOW radio can no longer succeed as a rock and roll music station Consider for example that the number of people in our listening area over fifty years of age has increased dramatically while our total number of listeners has 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...or the matured and flourished humanity. even though the violinist have more higher s...
^^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...umanity. even though the violinist have more higher skills, if the audience think the piani...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, for instance, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93994778068 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69756137848 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490861618799 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1836769839 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5789473684 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19568850049 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062577427677 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114712977487 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124511382745 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129133905077 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.