Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans have made significant breakthroughs in developing a understanding of the world around us in fields of science, technology, commerce, humanities and arts. This has been possible through contributions of people irrespective of their expertise in their respective domain.
It might be true that, experts of a particular field have vast knowledge of a subject, but I assert that value of beginners' judgement of a work on a field also holds weight and cannot be ignored.
Constant advancements are incessantly occuring in several fields. These progresses happening are critiqued by various people in the domain of the progress. The advancements are possible due to constant questioning and discussion among researchers working in an domain. Enquirying about a new research or work will lead to viewing the problem at hand from a different view. Consequently, it might be the case that the work can be revised and be improved than the earlier version. Breakthroughs are achieved due to inquisitiveness, knowledge and skill of the person. Beginners of a field might have less experience of working in an industry or academia, but it does not mean that they are unable to understand a work in their field.
Novices can bring a lot to the table, as many universities and industries across the world move towards a multi-disciplinary approach as opposed to archaic idea of people focused on single domain right from their undergraduate days. For an instance, a vast development occured in the field of nuclear energy as a result of critique by a beginner.
On the other hand, experts of a field are called 'experts' for a reason. They have a vast experience and have a grasp on the subject at hand. So, their critique of a work holds significant value. Beginners can be over enthusiastic and might think that many thngs can be added yo something previusly done which is not possible practically. Thus, in some cases their judgement of the work might lead to nowhere.
To conclude my assertion, it would be wrong to say that neophytes of a field should not have a say on the work of their field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 70
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalisation through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 50
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 55
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...significant breakthroughs in developing a understanding of the world around us in...
^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht be true that, experts of a particular field have vast knowledge of a subject, ...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...discussion among researchers working in an domain. Enquirying about a new research...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, thus, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99147727273 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08815965408 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514204545455 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.176840939 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6111111111 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164180471763 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541889495678 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575909045367 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921130153523 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322916771934 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.