Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt urgest that critical judgement coming from a person, not an expert, will stand little value compared to the same from an expert. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree" with the concept of the prompt and thereby obliged to provide necessary viewpoints in defense of my position.
First of all, in accordance to the definition of critical judgement - the paraphrasing of a situation, encompassing all of its magnitudes and factors and then come to a settle decision regarding that situation. According to this definition, critical judgement of a matter will require more circumscribtion of things that might escape for other judgements or decision making and thereby it requires special ability to make the judgement correct providing necessary reasoning. In this respect, an expert will get always preferance compared to a layperson who does not have the same ability of the expert. Morever, critical judgement of a predicament is something that requires years of experience and more broad outlook towards a problem which a simple person might not posses. Apat from that, an expert of a certain topic is supposed to provide more necessary, convinient and more than one solutions of a problem, among which there is high possiblity of success of at least one of those. On the other hand - a simple person who is not expert in a certain field - will not be aware of many factors regarding that field and as a result might ignore many aspects, resulting in scant amount of options available. Also, there is no guarantee that nay of those solutions will even happened to be successful, even though he had provided those solutions with his outmost critical ability. In this respect, the expert will always have the upper hand becasue of his experiences and plethora of learning in his own field, compared to the non-expert person.
Another thing is that - an expert of a certain criteria or of acertain field is called out an "expert" because of his expertise in his respective field. And this expertise comes from years of experiences, learnings, failures and successes. There will be hardly any chance that - the amount of knowledge an expert possess will be huge compared to the knowledge of a layperson. Even if the normal person gains enough theoritical knowledge then also he will not be able to equalize himself with the level of the expert. It is because of the experience the expert had gathered althrough his life. Because of those experience, the expert will be able to pierce through his respective works within a very short amount of time in reurn of a quick and favourable solution. For example - for making a ship - the owner of the ship will surely take the judgement of a ship-builing expert more seriously than the opinion of his employees or workers. Similarly in any kind of field works or research works the opinion and knowledge of an expert will always outplay the same of the other non-expert persons, mainly because of his expertise in the respective subject.
Opponent ot this view is that - it might not be always necessary that the knowledge of an expert will always be correct and so will always conduice a proper critical judgement. In many cases, specially in the empirical fields, there are many veteran workers and simple people who have been working for longer times. As a result, the knowledge of that person in that certain field will be enriched. And this is why he might challenge an expert who is relatively younger or has less experiences than those workers. Sometimes, years of expereince helps people to choose right decision and thus making correct critical judgement than to relative knowledge gained from books and mere experience and in those cases the critical judgement of a non-expert person will outplay the same of an expert.
So, looking at all the points and examples mentioned above, it is clearly evidant that in most cases the judgement of an expert is preferred to count, however, in certain circumstances the otherwise is also important to count.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 58
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 58
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 78
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'get'.
Suggestion: always get
...soning. In this respect, an expert will get always preferance compared to a layperson who ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 886, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one solution', 'a solution', or simply 'solutions'?
Suggestion: one solution; a solution; solutions
...ore necessary, convinient and more than one solutions of a problem, among which there is high...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1275, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...e that nay of those solutions will even happened to be successful, even though he had pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
... thing is that - an expert of a certain criteria or of acertain field is called out an &...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mpared to the knowledge of a layperson. Even if the normal person gains enough theoriti...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 949, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...he opinion of his employees or workers. Similarly in any kind of field works or research ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 477, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun experiences is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...expert who is relatively younger or has less experiences than those workers. Sometim...
^^^^
Line 7, column 568, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
...rs of expereince helps people to choose right decision and thus making correct critic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, then, thus, another thing, at least, for example, kind of, as a result, first of all, in many cases, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 99.0 58.6224719101 169% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3377.0 2235.4752809 151% => OK
No of words: 676.0 442.535393258 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99556213018 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09901951359 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77939126732 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418639053254 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1067.4 704.065955056 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.652669475 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.708333333 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95833333333 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202209616351 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703668268384 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425809506785 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128186639984 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535057527072 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.