Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Whether a critical judgement for work can only be given by an expert depends on the type and complexity of the work. Nevertheless an expert will always be able to assess a work in a better manner than any other individual who is unaware of the complexities of the work.
It is well known that an expert in a given field will have the technical know-how of the field. In his experience in that field of work he/she would have learnt, developed and studied many kinds of the works. If he does a critical judgement for a work he will do justice to it. For instance the symphonies composed by Beethoven are widely accepted as magnum opus but it might not appeal to a person who doesn’t have ear for music.
An expert has an eye for small changes, differences and faults in a work. He/she can appreciate it and find any discrepancies if there are. Expert can suggest implications of a work and its usability. For example many scientific discoveries may seem trivial but has large applicability in real world, such as the Viscous force in liquids being a scientific concept may seem of less interest to a person who is not having a scientific background but an expert will consider it as a breakthrough
.
Although in some fields like art, food and areas which affect the general public directly critical judgement from a layman could be useful as they are the people who are experiencing it. But this could be considered as a statistic which helps an expert in that field to assess and improve on it. General public can tell their experience with a work but cannot make critical judgement on it as they don’t know the complexities it. For example in cellular phones the user doesn’t know how the phone works but shares his experience with developer, the developer make changes to suit the end customer.
Finally we can conclude that even if a work affects the general public who doesn’t have knowledge of the work, they cannot pass critical judgement on it. Only an expert who has in depth knowledge of that field can assess it properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- A recent national survey found that the majority of workers with access to the Internet at work had used company computers for personal or recreational activities, such as banking or playing games. In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we s 69
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...on the type and complexity of the work. Nevertheless an expert will always be able to assess...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...pert will consider it as a breakthrough . Although in some fields like art, food...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ke art, food and areas which affect the general public directly critical judgement from a laym...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: Public
...hat field to assess and improve on it. General public can tell their experience with a work b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ke changes to suit the end customer. Finally we can conclude that even if a work aff...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 57, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...onclude that even if a work affects the general public who doesn't have knowledge of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70718232044 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72785702064 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477900552486 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6844048705 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311181252486 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123994940474 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755518804004 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197638079304 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372383000588 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.