Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

The issue that the expert of any field should make the critical judgement of that specific field only, otherwise it does not have any value is a contentious one. While each side has the strengths and weaknesses. But in my opinion, one can only judge if he is an expert of that field as he has gone through it, he faced the straggle and there is no chance of misleading. Furthermore, no one like to be judged by an inexpert, it causes dispute.

An expert has the sufficient knowledge about his field. He knows the ups and downs of his work. And he also knows how to get through it as he gone through different straggles. So, any judgement should always be made by an expert. Like, an expert engineer knows how a machine works as he worked with it for years. Hence, he is the right person to deem any engineer who is working with machine and his judgement with guide the new comer in the proper direction.

Secondly, an inexpert individual is not the right person to judge because he does not have proper knowledge about that field. And his advice could be dangerous plus misleading. Just like when an engineer starts advising a doctor that always is going to controversial. In addition this could be dangerous for that doctor’s career.

Thirdly, there is no one who loved to be judged by any inexpert. It also hurts someone’s ego. And it is definitely insulting for any individual to be lectured by anyone who does not have any concept about that field. So, whenever any inexpert of a field puts his judgement, it can always create dispute or argument between who judges and the one who is being judged. So, critical judgement should always be made by an expert of that field.

Nevertheless, some may claim that one may have little knowledge about a field but he is an expert on other field and knows the basis things about struggle of life, so are capable to judge because there is hardly much difference about basic things of any profession because every profession is meant to serve and they get paid for it. But no, before to judge someone one needs to have precise knowledge about it. As each profession has its uniqueness.

In conclusion, it is necessary to mention, to judge a thing is always a difficult task. And it’s need to be done by the expert otherwise, this could be misleading and may create conflict among people.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 jinjer 50 view
2020-01-19 jason123 83 view
2020-01-11 __annabelle__ 50 view
2019-12-19 cnegus 50 view
2019-12-18 ken10091995 50 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: NEW_COMER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newcomer'?
Suggestion: newcomer
...achine and his judgement with guide the new comer in the proper direction. Secondly, a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...at always is going to controversial. In addition this could be dangerous for that doctor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that one may have little knowledge about a field but he is an expert on other fie...
^^
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause every profession is meant to serve and they get paid for it. But no, before...
^^
Line 9, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eds to have precise knowledge about it. As each profession has its uniqueness. ...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in my opinion']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.190476190476 0.238963963785 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.17316017316 0.154291517835 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0649350649351 0.0886310499679 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0497835497835 0.0506014161523 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0627705627706 0.0449626384858 140% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116883116883 0.123526278965 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0367965367965 0.0379742944744 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53240289152 2.82910677849 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030303030303 0.0316879551592 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0014075125626 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.119047619048 0.0950106342287 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0238095238095 0.0245489744465 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.021645021645 0.0157978311181 137% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2351.0 2899.98275862 81% => OK
No of words: 419.0 478.390804598 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61097852029 6.0591788892 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.65681771538 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.298329355609 0.369966551584 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.195704057279 0.285172536893 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.150357995227 0.207245337619 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102625298329 0.136322040163 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53240289152 2.82910677849 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 234.298850575 79% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439140811456 0.492565540709 89% => OK
Word variations: 47.2544898681 56.8184620615 83% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 21.1264367816 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4583333333 23.7468607788 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0287495028 62.0618507366 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9583333333 143.81877709 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 23.7468607788 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.728815259664 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.87931034483 123% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.71264367816 65% => OK
Readability: 37.0287390613 52.2641144681 71% => OK
Elegance: 1.20454545455 1.64547068916 73% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335021343064 0.39480681544 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103823083993 0.11556216369 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0883220703817 0.0736162880345 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.493141689779 0.531340600358 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173346904843 0.15197228837 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115400332153 0.158818324754 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759637701277 0.0851127212816 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.292616528424 0.388921930462 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0638706236727 0.0677916285025 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2067870958 0.28015025965 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076128822242 0.0610219844235 125% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.8591954023 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30459770115 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.96264367816 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 8.10632183908 37% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.93390804598 153% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.04597701149 98% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 15.0862068966 80% => OK

--------------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 3.75 Out of 6