Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement cites here, educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. It is important for a student's success in future if they pursue the right field of study instead of wasting time on studying unrelated subjects which may not lead him towards success and in this case education institutions should always guide them and advise which fields they should not pursue for their better future.
In educational institutions, various students enrol each year in various fields, so the educational institutions have a better observation of the success and failure of the students and the reason behind that. For example, if a student wants to get admission in Computer Science as he likes computer but has a poor score in Mathematics, most likely he would not make much success in that field. But as he likes computer he may argue that despite having poor marks in Mathematics he will be successful if he studies hard. But the educational institutions are dealing which such students for years and they are well informed which student should pursue which field based on their background. So they should not allow the students to take the field where they can not succeed.
Furthermore, one may argue that if any students take any particular field and study diligently he will become successful. But if such case was true then there would not be specific criteria to take admission in each field of study. Those criteria are meant to lead a student to the path of success based on their background. For instance, if a student gets admission in medical field despite having a better exposer and contribution in other fields than that, after completing his study may not be as successful as he would get in other field and may regrate for pursuing that. Hence, if the institution suggested him not to pursue medical such situation would not occur.
In conclusion, as the students have very less experience and understanding of the various educational fields but the educational institutes have broad view and experience of handling such cases, so the educational institutes should take responsibility to dissuade them from pursuing fields where they may not succeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wi 50
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work the commute now takes 12
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ikely to succeed. It is important for a students success in future if they pursue the ri...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07795698925 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8047555436 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41935483871 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.4482643372 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.307692308 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6153846154 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334031033226 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148737887861 0.0831039109588 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147874733032 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251370285001 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109764032576 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.