The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the current century, we surrounded by various luxurious items and accustomed to lead a luxurious life. Here the statement cites the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals which I do not quite agree with.
Nowadays we have all the basic needs in our life which provide us to lead a comfortable and hassle-free lifestyle that could not be imagined a couple of decades before. We can not say that having all the necessary comfort it's hindering people from developing into strong and independent individuals. For instance, now we have the car for our daily commute which gives us comfort and saves our time a lot but nowhere it's preventing us to not be strong and independent. It is just giving us more time to utilize for a worthy purpose and making us independent not to depend upon the weather condition or the distance to travel.
Furthermore, everybody has a TV in their home these days. It can be though as luxuries item but it gives are lots of benefits and helps us to be a strong individual. For example, a great and inspirational show gives us courage and support to carry out a difficult task which seemed unviable before. A football tournament gives inspiration to lots of people by watching a player's extraordinary performance which again makes them strong from inside.
In conclusion, having a luxuries life and all the conveniences help us to learn how to be stronger and independent in our life and never prevent from developing into strong and independent individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | ayush.45 | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | Varun Gohil | 50 | view |
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rt and saves our time a lot but nowhere its preventing us to not be strong and inde...
^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a player' or simply 'players'?
Suggestion: a player; players
...spiration to lots of people by watching a players extraordinary performance which again m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'luxuries'' or 'luxury's'?
Suggestion: luxuries'; luxury's
...from inside. In conclusion, having a luxuries life and all the conveniences help us t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95849056604 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96457306964 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532075471698 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 704.065955056 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2228218269 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.454545455 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293827724545 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127756303882 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138907200763 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228217911919 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122991845232 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.