Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Today's children are tomorrow's citizens. Educational institutions mould the future of society by nurturing children. In this modern society, we have various fields of study that one might find it difficult to know which field they want to pursue. Educational institutions can offer help by exposing students to different areas of study. But the final decision of pursuing which career must be left to the student himself/herself.
The brain of a child is not completely developed yet. So, schools should not decide he/she doesn't have a talent towards math or arts. Later the skills may bloom and a student who once a failure in math might become an engineer. Schools should be helping students develop in their weak areas. They should not tell students that they have no talent in this area so they shouldn't pursue it. Schools are not taking any responsibility for their students' futures, so they don't have any right to decide their students' careers.
There are some cases where schools/teachers alluded their students not to take a career or censured that they are good for nothing, but time revealed it's not the case. For example, Thomas Alva Edison was told that he was not fit for schooling. Albert Einstein was rejected many times in entrance test for his university. Of course, these are some celebrities whose life stories are known to all. We may also know some neighbours or relatives who pursued the subjects they were weak once.
The point is that one can't decide a student's career or dissuade them from following some paths when they're still young. Educational institutions must not do that. One may oppose it by saying that young ones don't know what to follow, so it is the job of the adults to pave the path for them. It is good that adults are taking their time to nurture children. But they must not close some roads based on their prejudice. For example, it is prevalent in South India that parents give only two options for their children: engineering or medicine. They dissuade children from following other paths. This scenario must be changed.
All in all, educational institutions should bot dissuade students from following specific careers. They should inform the pros and cons and should leave the decision to students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t. So, schools should not decide he/she doesnt have a talent towards math or arts. Lat...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...hey have no talent in this area so they shouldnt pursue it. Schools are not taking any r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ity for their students futures, so they dont have any right to decide their students...
^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...are good for nothing, but time revealed its not the case. For example, Thomas Alva ...
^^^
Line 13, column 23, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e weak once. The point is that one cant decide a students career or dissuade th...
^^^^
Line 13, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...ade them from following some paths when theyre still young. Educational institutions m...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 208, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...may oppose it by saying that young ones dont know what to follow, so it is the job o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, as to, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97361477573 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57189491453 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543535620053 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1028303421 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.5 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5769230769 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.30769230769 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312204781932 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779115606109 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775988962296 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175463389262 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087692883751 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.