Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The claim made is that it is incumbent upon the educational institutions to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. They claim may on the face of it attract a lot of criticism, as it seems to be somewhat curbing freedom of student. However one cannot overlook the merits of the claim which are described below in detail.
First and foremost, students are not some highly experienced, professionally trained individuals, who can easily see list out the merits and demerits of a situation and act accordingly. Students are still at the nascent stages in their carriers and thus are easily susceptible to making wrong choices about their field of study. However, educational institutions on the other hand are pretty much experts in such a situation. They certainly have a huge experience and also a detailed record of the student performance. Therefore, it only behooves, educational institutions to timely assess the students and provide them with a clear picture about the chances of success. Like in my case when after, completing my high school I also faced a same kind of dilemma. Whether to pursue my higher education in the field of medical or engineering. At that time it was only the valuable insights from my teachers, about what is better for me, that helped me make the right decision.
Moreover, if educational institutions adopt such a policy to discourage students from pursuing fields in which the future prospects are not bright, it may actually prove to be a blessing for the students. To explain my case let us focus on College education in US. The cost of getting a College degree is very high there. Students often take huge loans to pursue their education. Seemingly, in such a scenario pursuing a degree in a field in which your performance is not that good or your aptitude is below par will most certainly hamper your prospects for better employment opportunities, or in worst case leave you jobless with huge debts to pay. Such a scenario could be avoided if college authorities timely assess the student capabilities and based on those encourage them to choose their field of study.
On the contrary, such a policy can be seen as interfering with a student’s freedom to pursue studies in their fields of interest. Students who want to study science and become scientists, may well get discouraged enough to give up science and take up finance.
In conclusion, I am of the view that educational institutions must certainly encourage the students to pursue fields in which the likelihood of success is greater.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 54
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 58
- “Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.” 54
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...stitutions on the other hand are pretty much experts in such a situation. They certa...
^^^^
Line 4, column 595, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the worst'.
Suggestion: in the worst
...for better employment opportunities, or in worst case leave you jobless with huge debts ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the likelihood of success is greater.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'actually', 'also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224318658281 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.146750524109 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0775681341719 0.0880659088768 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0754716981132 0.0497285424764 152% => OK
Pronouns: 0.062893081761 0.0444667217837 141% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.134171907757 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0272536687631 0.0406280797675 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88643187485 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0335429769392 0.030933414821 108% => OK
Particles: 0.0041928721174 0.0016655270985 252% => OK
Determiners: 0.0859538784067 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0188679245283 0.0249443105267 76% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0188679245283 0.0148568991511 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2606.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 435.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9908045977 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36091954023 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268965517241 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202298850575 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128735632184 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88643187485 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 57.1261738789 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.75 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7991403277 59.4972553346 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.3 141.124799967 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 0.674092028746 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 48.6465517241 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.35294117647 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420895427899 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0842917342532 0.123202303941 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0597401402467 0.077325440228 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502847406639 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174325266578 0.149214159877 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154439026581 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121779901128 0.0892212321368 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.321518722956 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0906102421431 0.0692045440612 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285616595771 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078814797017 0.0653680567796 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.