Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
The claim that educational institution have a responsibility to dissuade students seems a pragmatic one. I fully concur with the claim, because such a scenario is beneficial for the student as well as the university.
Firstly, Life is all about making the correct decisions at the right time. As a student making a career choice can be very daunting task for most of the students except the prodigies. Students are often confused about what their interest is and what is better for them. Like in my case after completing my school I was also confused about whether to study Medical or engineering. I consulted my teachers, and suggestions from them actually helped me to realize my strengths and weakness in both the areas and make a better decision. So educational institution must certainly ensure that a student is made to realize about the chances of success, pursuing a field of study.
Secondly, by pursuing such a policy educational institutions will actually help students save a lot of time, money and effort. For example in US mostly cost of education is very high. College students have to take huge loans to fund their education, and pursuing a field of study in which one is unlikely to succeed, will not only hamper the prospects for a better life, but one may also end up incurring huge debts. All the time and effort, all the hard work done may all end up being wasted. However, such a situation could be avoided if the college authorities dissuade students from pursuing a field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
On the contrary, however, it is for a student to decide which field of study to pursue. There are students who initially may not be initially inclined towards a particular field, but develop the aptitude for the subject at a later stage. Dissuading such students at an early stage based on their performance, may actually discourage the student and would not prove to be helpful at all.
In conclusion, educational institutions certainly have a responsibility in ensuring that students pursue their studies in fields with a likelihood of success. However, the chances of success for students in field should also be carefully evaluated and not done in haste.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 58
- “Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.” 54
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 54
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 54
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efully evaluated and not done in haste.
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224390243902 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.163414634146 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0609756097561 0.0880659088768 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0682926829268 0.0497285424764 137% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0390243902439 0.0444667217837 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131707317073 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0512195121951 0.0406280797675 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79205221218 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0268292682927 0.030933414821 87% => OK
Particles: 0.00487804878049 0.0016655270985 293% => OK
Determiners: 0.10487804878 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0268292682927 0.0249443105267 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0146341463415 0.0148568991511 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2216.0 2732.02544248 81% => OK
No of words: 375.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90933333333 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.352 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285333333333 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213333333333 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112 0.132149295362 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79205221218 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509333333333 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 54.9791778358 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8333333333 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4312020445 59.4972553346 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 141.124799967 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.674092028746 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 49.3666666667 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.5045045045 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372028897059 0.391690518653 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118483863158 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0700614959795 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528781876138 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149661691111 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138863682429 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125266097279 0.0892212321368 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.2791579475 0.385218514788 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0758359288052 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22297562802 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101449198548 0.0653680567796 155% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.