Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Education is an important part in student’s life. If students get effective education they will become successful in their life. However, whether educators should find out what students want and include in curriculum is debatable. Educators should know what their student wants and it is good for students or not.
Students should suggest what they want to learn in their curriculum. If students choose their curriculum then they learn effectively. They give their best and become more successful in life. Sometimes students clear in terms of their goal in life. To achieve their goal, they do not want some subject in their curriculum. If they most of their time their respective learning then they may expert in their field. If somebody wants to make his career in sports, then he should provide his most of the time in practice rather than focus on other subjects which may not help. So, students should learn what they want to do which may help in future.
In contrast, there are some students who may not know what they want in their life. They goals are not clear in their mind. Suggestions from these students may dangerous. They change their goals and their wants may change frequently. It is difficult for educators to make curriculum which keeps changing. It may affect other students as well as they did not learn effectively and efficiently. So, educators should make curriculum which acceptable to all students and which is helpful to all students.
However, sometimes educators also need to understand what their students want. After all, students are the one who are going to learn. If they teach what students want, then students will effectively learn and understands as well. And also educators should make curriculum by themselves because they are more experienced than their students. They know what will help their students. Educators ask suggestions from students and based on their suggestions should make a curriculum which is best of students. Thus, educators and students must co-operate each other to make a better curriculum.
In conclusion, educators should take suggestions and make a best curriculum for students. These way students will learn more attentively and effectively. Cooperation between educators and students make a best curriculum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... important part in student's life. If students get effective education they w...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...they want to learn in their curriculum. If students choose their curriculum then t...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... want some subject in their curriculum. If they most of their time their respectiv...
^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...arn what they want to do which may help in future. In contrast, there are some student...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...cators should take suggestions and make a best curriculum for students. These way...
^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ion between educators and students make a best curriculum.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, after all, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70813484073 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.382113821138 0.4932671777 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3807158531 60.3974514979 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.4137931034 118.986275619 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.724137931 23.4991977007 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.27586206897 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368589396062 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144632635795 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120285810629 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278285462623 0.150359130593 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10910688979 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.37 8.38706741573 76% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.