What every student deserves is not only education but 'quality' education. However, as simple as it is to state, it seems out to be quite difficult to ensure that students receive 'quality' education. By 'quality' here, I intend to mean more than merely knowing facts and information. And that is what the recommendation asks for-'quality' education and hence, my agreement with it.
I brought up the notion of 'quality' education and my agreement with the recommendation in the previous paragraph. Here, I would like to expound on my position and explain why it is required. Students, considered the future of tomorrow, would indeed be the future only if they are interested in a particular field and have developed the adequate level of competencies to be proficient in that field. For this to be true, it would behoove the students to not only know the facts but also the ideas and concepts that those facts illustrate. This is important because when a student gets into the professional field, it is his or her learning gained over the past years that decides how much successful he or she would become. If the student only knows facts and data and doesn't know how to distill the ideas, concepts and important information from those facts and data then the student is likely to have a tough time. Even simple problems would seem conundrums to them and slowly, they would find their profession humdrum. This may, unfortunately, lead to unemployment.
Not having an appropriate assessment strategy to test learning in educational institutions can lead to serious implications. For example, Research and Development in a country can get seriously hampered. Research asks the researchers to think creatively which is possible only if the researcher has his or her concepts cleared. Only having a grasp on facts would not lead to novelty, and hence, as a result, there would be no progress in this field. This would fail the very objective of having research institutes, making the country increasingly dependable on other countries. Also, apart from this consequence, another very serious implication can be a paucity of capable educators in the educational institutions. A bunch of students of today would go on to become tomorrow’s educators. And if today’s students do not have the right learning, it is hard to imagine how capable educators they would prove to be tomorrow.
Solution to these problems calls for the educators to be responsible enough so that they inculcate the right way of learning in the students from the starting. This requires the educator to assess the student’s ability to extract ideas, trends, inferences and the concepts behind those facts. Having this kind of assessment will make sure that the student gets the essence of learning, which would later prove to be beneficial for the student and ultimately for the country.
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendati 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e student only knows facts and data and doesnt know how to distill the ideas, concepts...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, apart from, for example, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09341825902 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93962213294 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488322717622 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1673701243 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.304347826 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4782608696 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200858405098 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619988905656 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500640725024 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131571666943 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362576074036 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.