Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
When it comes to the issue the best method of teaching, some people believe that educator should teach facts only after students about the ideas, trends, and concepts of the facts. However, others have the opposite view and think that this approach needs much time. As far as I am concerned, the last point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reason.
To begin with, this way of teaching helps students to have more background about the matter, and more focus on it. In fact, they can ask more questions and enrich their knowledge. Furthermore, students will be active in the class, think critically, discuss with teachers, and become more familiar with others aspects of the topic.
In contrast, time is a great factor that prohibits educators to use this procedure. Indeed, the teacher should wait much time that students have studied about the ideas, facts, and concepts because every issue has many aspects that learning them needs time. I think that a small example can give some light on this topic. For example, when the student wants to study about the industrial revolution, he must spend much time to consider all its aspects. In economical angel, industrial revolution helps human to produce more in a short time. In addition, global economic had changed tremendously, and people were able to purchase wares with low prices. In biological dimension, factories destroy plenty of forests to use their wood as well as making human habitations. Moreover, burning fossil fuels increased the amount of carbon dioxide and intensified the global warming, which increases the Earth temperature, melting ice caps, changing the pattern of participation, and bringing long drought. So, the student has to devote much time to study each of these concepts.
All above evidence indicates that learning ideas, trends, and concepts, which are related the fact, allows the student to learn more and better, while the time is a great obstacle to use this method for teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | bhavya_vasudeva | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 58
- A gift (such as a camera, a soccer ball, or an animal) can contribute to a child`s development. What gift would you give to help a child develop? Why? Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice. 66
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. 50
- Do you prefer high-salary jobs that require you to leave your family and friends or low-salary jobs that allow you to stay with your family and friends? 3
- The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your answer. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...able to purchase wares with low prices. In biological dimension, factories destroy...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'as well as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.155263157895 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102631578947 0.0880659088768 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0289473684211 0.0497285424764 58% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0289473684211 0.0444667217837 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110526315789 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0315789473684 0.0406280797675 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49045929729 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0342105263158 0.030933414821 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102631578947 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0157894736842 0.0249443105267 63% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105263157895 0.0148568991511 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2011.0 2732.02544248 74% => OK
No of words: 330.0 452.878318584 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09393939394 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363636363636 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272727272727 0.280924506359 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181818181818 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10303030303 0.132149295362 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49045929729 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.48968727796 119% => OK
Word variations: 64.9495433603 55.4138127331 117% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4117647059 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0177877052 59.4972553346 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.294117647 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.674092028746 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 46.6844919786 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.83950617284 1.64882698954 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299083940668 0.391690518653 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0838618632692 0.123202303941 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0523190564382 0.077325440228 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.483474458025 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.19227419799 0.149214159877 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10184269563 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10886688407 0.0892212321368 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.365945834459 0.385218514788 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0363422026483 0.0692045440612 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212252808751 0.275328986314 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845671707971 0.0653680567796 129% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.