The responsibility of educators is to share their profound knowledge of various ideas, trends, and concepts with their fellow students. To make sure adequate knowledge is delivered to the students a cooperative gesture between the educators and the students is necessary. The prompt suggests that educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. I mostly disagree with the statement for the following two reasons, although I do concede that to understand certain concepts students do require some sort of previous knowledge.
Firstly, not all of the students will be motivated enough to acquire previous knowledge of several ideas, trends, and concepts. Nowadays most of the students are reluctant to learn things that are not assigned as a home task from their educational institutions. Moreover, it is impossible for an educator to make sure every student in the classroom has studied a particular concept previously. Even if they have studied it before, it is possible that there is inconsistency in the amount of knowledge among the students. For example, some lazy students may have skimmed a topic, some may have read it thoroughly and others may have gained a vague understanding of the same topic. It will be tough for the teacher to determine the level of difficulty from where he would start discussing the topic.
Secondly, a teacher should come up with ideas, trends, and concepts that are novel to the pupils which will create enthusiasm among them. They will start to learn from the very basic idea of the topic to the most advanced concepts with the assistance of the educator. It is the duty of the educator to build the foundation on a new subject matter that will excite them from the very beginning. An interactive class where every student will participate interestedly and the use of props may make it easier for the teacher to make the topic clear to the students. For example, if a topic is previously known by the students, some may lose interest to join the classes as they would think they already know this. To make the students zealous enough, it is necessary to present new concepts before them with proper educational props and equipment.
I do concede that in some cases students’ some sort of previous knowledge will be beneficial for the educators for their ease of teaching. For example, if a student knows basic C programming it will be helpful for the instructor to teach him any new programming language. As C programming already covers the programming fundamentals, it will be easier for both the teacher and the student to cooperate while learning.
Of course, it is possible for the teachers to carry on the knowledge-delivering process to the students who come with zero background knowledge but in some special cases, we can encourage having some previous knowledge which will be convenient for both the teachers and the students.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: rachel028
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rt of previous knowledge. Firstly, not all of the students will be motivated enough to ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, of course, sort of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03462321792 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83450524197 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439918533605 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5706161357 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.6 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259198487229 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953779285562 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137650092316 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157913439613 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135557823166 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.