As per the writer, the quality of political awareness or disclosure have substantially decresed with recent impact of social media. I do not agree with writer.
Yes, In current times the impact of social media is pronounced in every field, as well as in politics. Political content is everywhere, be it on TV News Channel, Internet, Newspaper etc. But, it would be a stretch to say that with ever present political coverage on all the platform have declined the quality content of political discourse. In past, where politics was limited to news channel's debates to the news papers and handlful of people covering and presenting the politics, in present time there is no such distinction. Everyone is entilted to have their opinion and certainly with social media and blogs, they can present their views to a larger public.
Take for example, a youtube blogger, who is basically a comedian and his genre of comedy revolves around current day political affairs, he is one of the famous youtube blogger who thrives on politics and day to day affairs. He has been subscribed by over 14 million people all over the world and having reached to such large population and being liked by them clearly shows that people are interested in this new genre of political representation. Can we still say, if it has degraded the quality of political coverage? Certainly not, all he has done is to provide a new way of political awareness, which is interesting and eventually drive people to be more politically aware.
Another instance where a social networking platform being actively used by poeple to discuss and debate over current affairs, these discussions are open to all kind of people to participate , even people outside the US. with these platforms, debates which were limited to TV anchors and politicians are now open to all. Surely, this does increase the noise and possibilities of false media reports, but still enhancing awareness of the people using the social media platform.
With the emerging power of social media, the competition for TV new Channels for TRP and for new paper to have increasing sale, these media houses choose to politicize issues which are definately not required or to misrepresent certain issue to gain more sales, which is not morally right and eventually degrade the quality of political coverage, but to blame social media for this is definately a stretch.
In conclusion, Social media have open up more channels to discuss and create political contents and encourged people, not only in US, but also to other parts of the world, to participate in positive disscussion and debates, raised the awareness among all age groups about politics and thus increasing the quality of political disclosure. Although social media and blogs might have increased political noises, it is definately a stretch to blame social media for the declined quality of political coverage.
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics 66
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics 62
- Nation should allow same curriculum before college. 75
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 24
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a stretch to say that with ever present political coverage on all the platform h...
^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...quality content of political discourse. In past, where politics was limited to news cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pen to all kind of people to participate , even people outside the US. with these ...
^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for TV new Channels for TRP and for new paper to have increasing sale, these med...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08141962422 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72709845298 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494780793319 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.8053454505 60.3974514979 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.176470588 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1764705882 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28768042043 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107893093272 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704242586826 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163329893936 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707105300604 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.