The author states that Scandals bring focus on the problems which cannot be done in efficient way by any reformer or by any speaker. Hence, should be treated as bane to the society. I partly agree with the writer, as they do bring our attention to the problem of the society in an instant, that sometimes no other social worker or a reformer can, even after spreading the awareness of the problem for long time. But we should not treat Scandals with positive note because sometimes the scandals can impact out image of society in a negative way, front of other societies and can thus bring shame on nation itself.
Having agreed that scandals can bring certain problems in limelight, they can trigger a nationwide impact and raise awareness. This awareness sometimes can bring constructive impact on people or the society as whole. For instance, a novel by Khalid Husseini "Thousand splendid Sun", raised a scandal with the contents of the book by elaborating the abuse done on women in general, How they were raped, sold off. Even though the novel created a huge uproar, but society was even more aware about the women abuse, and how new motion got strength against women abuse. Here, we should acknowledge that prior to this novel, there was a plethora of NGO and activist working to raise the awareness about the same, but they were not as successful as the scandal. We should here emphasis that this scandal eventually strengthens the motion that these activists started.
On the other hand, there are scandals, which bring whole society to shame and put the whole nation in a bad light in front of the whole world. To elaborate my point, consider one of the scandal, recently emerged in media, when one Government official was caught red handed taking bribe from one of the industrialist. This government official was representing the environmental awareness in WHO, who can be seen thrashing industrialist and other government for neglecting their part in saving environment. This scandal left a huge impact on the government, apart from the worldwide shame that nation received was nothing compared to the economic impact on the Nation, as WHO decided to levy a fine and closed their funding. My point is to emphasis on the fact, that scandal can sometimes tarnish the whole image of the society and should not be dealt with light hands.
In conclusion, I would argue that even though scandals sometimes bring an impact of positive awareness on the society. They do sometimes strengthen the position of the reformers, by supporting a noble cause. They should not be treated as usefulness for the society. Scandal can impact the society in unpredictable way, and sometimes also bring shame to an individual, society or even to the whole nation. Henceforth, without knowing the impacts of the scandal, we should never treat the scandals as some necessity or boon to the society.
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 62
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 29
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 528, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...candals can impact out image of society in a negative way, front of other societies and can thus ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Thousand'.
Suggestion: A Thousand
...tance, a novel by Khalid Husseini 'Thousand splendid Sun', raised a scandal wi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...esenting the environmental awareness in WHO, who can be seen thrashing industrialis...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, then, thus, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94467213115 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64195138392 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456967213115 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9864731702 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.65 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190479862617 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624578420854 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064555426571 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130229162928 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939463275413 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.