Essay topic 25: In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To be successful and make positively considerable contributions in any field of endeavor, a sufficient contribution of knowledge, ability, passion, experience and expertise are required. Therefore, the assertion that novices make significant contributions than experts does not hold true generally, though, there may be exceptions.
To begin with, many fields like science, mathematics and philosophy require technological background. An expert has the basic understanding of the field of inquiry to enable him make a contribution in that area. To illustrate this, let us consider the example of science which needs at least deep knowledge of math, preceding theories and the functioning of the scientific method which are vague to a novice that most likely make it impossible for him to make a great contributions to science. Majority of scientists have spent many years of hard research in their fields to make contributions to the science later. For instance, Albert Einstein could not have proposed the Theory of Relativity if he had not probed the previous scientists’ research and knowledge in that area.
This could also be true for other fields like philosophy. In order to develop an acceptable philosophical perspective, one should know the theories and views of prior philosophers to acquire the relevant concepts which need lot of efforts and time. As a result, he could make a contribution in his field.
In contrast, it is argued that the above claim is convincing about talented people. Mozart, for instance, has made great contributions to music by composing significant music since he was young. Avecnia, a great Persian scientist, is another example of this phenomenon. He began learning and studying about various fields such as astronomy, math, science and medicine. He wrote multitude books in the area of medicine which are currently taught in highly prestige universities throughout the world.
In conclusion, to make important contributions in any field of inquiry requires in-depth knowledge of the field and experience and research which are gained by spending interminable hard work and efforts in that area. Thus, novices are unable to make remarkable contributions in any field expect talented people.
- Essay Topic 15: Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 83
- Essay topic 12: A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with theclaim. In developing and supporting your pos 66
- Essay topic 2: Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In devel 83
- Essay topic 28: Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 83
- Essay topic 32: In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'contribution'?
Suggestion: contribution
...e it impossible for him to make a great contributions to science. Majority of scientists have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49137931034 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15791916117 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9014777662 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.411764706 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176851806483 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602034136522 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401053624484 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105851759804 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040517812362 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.