The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each.
With the advent of science there are new frontiers that are opening day by day. These frontiers are helping us understand very intricate subtleties of the humankind as well as nature around us. How we are made, how universe is made and so on are possible to be slightly understood now because of science. But it is not necessarily true that science is only helping to reassure us or helping to make us understand things around us. Similarly, the purpose of art is not solely to upset us. It can also motivate us, make us happy, satisfied, and decrease our stress and anxiety. To support my definition, I will present examples in the passage below.
First of all, it is true that science is helping us to understand our human body structure and how human being is designed or evolved. But, as we explore more about human body, the more complex it becomes. This make us think how can something as arcane as this can be designed by someone, who can think of such a complex machine. Hence, in this scenario, science is not helping us reassure that we are not made by some supernatural force and there is someone who is responsible for designing the human and nature around us and species around us are not made due to evolution but this is because of powerful force who is responsible for making the universe.
Similarly we cannot just say that art is there to upset us. Whenever we see something beautiful it makes our mind relaxed and stress free, increasing our productivity and longevity. Additionally, whenever we see dance, arts work, painting, etc. we get to know about the mindset and thinking of other people. These things makes us happy and satisfied and also sometimes motivates us to do the same. However it is true that when we see a hungry child in painting we feel sad, but we also feel motivated to do something for mankind. Therefore art play one of the important role in helping the human to be happy as well as to see the reality around us. As it is aptly said, a picture is worth a thousand words, similarly art helps us convey a message in the most apt way, which can sometime upset us, but can also help in making us happy.
It is also true that science help us to reassure. In earlier times human being tend to think of lighting in cloud to be an anger from the god, but science helped us reassure that this is nothing but just a natural phenomenon. Similarly science helped us understand various phenomenon such as climate change, how to tackle with climate change, make us reassure that we can live even if we get some fatal diseases, which was not possible earlier. Therefore, science helps us to reassure us but also sometimes bewilder us.
As, we have seen by the examples presented above, domain of science cannot be just limited to reassuring us, it can also make things around us more obscure and complex. Similarly, art is just not to upset us, it can make things around us lively and happy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | tannistha2019GREessays | 50 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Mroza | 54 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | pritmodi | 58 | view |
| 2018-09-15 | Antony Urmise Jose | 58 | view |
| 2017-04-26 | akshatha ts | 50 | view |
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
- The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes. 50
- A recent study with a researcher pretending to have a broken down car on the side of the road showed that when the researcher was a man,60% of the time, a man pulled over to help them, and 0% of the time a woman stopped to help. When the researcher was a 66
- The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes. 50
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...responsible for making the universe. Similarly we cannot just say that art is there to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'make'.
Suggestion: make
... thinking of other people. These things makes us happy and satisfied and also sometim...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... sometimes motivates us to do the same. However it is true that when we see a hungry ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... motivated to do something for mankind. Therefore art play one of the important role in h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding reality'?
Suggestion: the surrounding reality
...the human to be happy as well as to see the reality around us. As it is aptly said, a picture is wort...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... nothing but just a natural phenomenon. Similarly science helped us understand various ph...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sure us but also sometimes bewilder us. As, we have seen by the examples present...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 33.0505617978 230% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56356736243 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4967412843 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417457305503 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 786.6 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.740449438202 540% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0290947008 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.08 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817350751272 0.243740707755 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422239140618 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572228728652 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601794026009 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177152848635 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.