Government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Government officials are in principle representatives that are elected by the public. Thus, it is their utmost duty to serve the people and the country for its well being. Still there may be disputes in deciding whether their actions should be done through individual contemplation or wholly on behalf of the public’s interest. This essay will provide several certain situations and contexts where politicians and officials are required to behave either by one’s own judgement or by the people’s opinion.
Firstly, in general circumstances, political figures need to carry out the will of the people especially when considering the elements of basic needs and living conditions. The most well known example is the New Deal Policy launched by F.D. Roosevelt. This policy came out solely to alleviate the economic hardship and unemployment and enhance the deteriorated quality of life due to the catastrophic financial recession. That is, it can be said that the main drive force for implementing certain policies can be easily discerned by putting the public’s will into priority. As a nation can be prosperous only through a stabilized public health and order, the government shall be in standby position in terms of serving the basic needs and interests of their people.
However, when looking into certain situations such as a national emergency or moments when collective violence and atrocity is prevalent, government officials ought to be contemplative and may even dare to take a choice that might go against the public’s will. For example, faced by the worldwide spread of Covid 19, many governmental officials are dealing with the difficulty in persuading their citizens to take vaccines and wearing proper masks. It has become controversial whether these collective behaviors are safe enough and many people have started to show anxiety and precariousness. Even in some regions, protests and riots have been happening in terms of gainsaying the governmental proposal. Yet, however, if the government had postponed the vaccination, then there is a strong likelihood that the whole world might fall into more danger. Similarly, when reminding of the history of Nazi regime and several author fascist communities, the governmental officials not only have to take a break and ponder on the seriousness of the potential violence against other nations or groups of people, but also have to dare to act against the public. It is widely known that the Holocaust had happened just because nobody paused the implementation even though there were some people who felt contrite in devastating the basis of human dignity. Thus it is important for governments to have enough discernment in taking any action.
Thus, the conclusion now stands that the government has to have its discernment in choosing whether it is more proper to act as a servant of the public or it is rather not to follow the radicality of the people. In this regard, we may have to have wary vigilance in evaluating the behaviors and actions of the political figures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 75 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ahasan | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 79
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 92
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times 79
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 16
- Government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ple and the country for its well being. Still there may be disputes in deciding wheth...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...devastating the basis of human dignity. Thus it is important for governments to have...
^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and actions of the political figures.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21588594705 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92771681567 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529531568228 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2666047571 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.789473684 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8421052632 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191063957131 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557260509735 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454601783563 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117965986851 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701519794891 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.