Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Government officials are the people thet work for the government, which serves the nation. The prompt suggests that the government officials should relay on their own judgement rather than do what the people want. I mostly disagree with the prompt for the following reasons.
Firstly, In a democratic country like ours, people are the supreme power: here people run the government, which inturn runs the nation. So, it is essential for the public officers to run the project thet are compatible with the people of that specific locality, rather than running a holistic view of development. This creates the incongrous relation between the officials and the people; As a result the development work runs smoothly. For an instance, the when the public opinion is prioritise in the developmantal work then the public participation, smoothness of the work and its efficacy aggrandises. On contrary, when the local opinion regarding the developmet is neglected then the efficacy of the work decreases.
Secondly, Democracy is by the people, for the people, to the people. When the people elecet the individual they inturn hope that in future their opinions are respected. So, it is essential to create the harmony between the government and the public. If no honor is given to the public will then it is very unlikely that the strife and conflict will not occur. For an instance, a farmer who has spent most of his life in agriculture believes can solve the problems like pest management through the traditional way; However the agriculture scientist that has done numerous trials and cannot convince the farmer in using the modern commercial method. Then it is surely to occur conflict. On the other hand where the the scientist is able to convince the farmer the outcomes are viseversa.
Lastly, some might argue that in a multiparty democratic country like ours, it is very difficult to form an alliance between the peolpe and the officers. As, there are opposition in the local governance, who always finds the way to critise the developmant work carried out by the government officer. So, in such cases the officer must relay on their judgenment and carry out the work that they feel will bring some positive change in the locality.
In conclusin, the government oficial must be judicious, wise, prudent, flexible and rigid when required. And, carry out the development works.
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 58
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 60
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council Two years ago consultants predicted that West Egg s landfill which is used for garbage disposal would be completely filled within five years During the past two 73
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prioritised'.
Suggestion: prioritised
...nstance, the when the public opinion is prioritise in the developmantal work then the publ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... people, for the people, to the people. When the people elecet the individual they i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...occur conflict. On the other hand where the the scientist is able to convince the farme...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...occur conflict. On the other hand where the the scientist is able to convince the farme...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07908163265 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71140589709 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502551020408 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.777070933 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.55 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249291821241 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715134045949 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877935171159 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143648372499 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881662390422 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.