Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials are appointed to maintain peace in society by working for the welfare of people, but that doesn’t mean that people can boss around them. They should cooperate with each other to build a better society. There is a debate about whether government officials should rely solely on their own judgement or if they should also consider the will of the people they serve. While I partially agree with the notion, I believe that government officials should respect and show interest in the concerns of the people they serve in order to effectively solve problems.
Firstly, government officials undergo a rigorous selection process and dedicate a significant amount of time to preparing for their role. Additionally, they typically have a strong academic background. After completing their studies, they participate in a government training programme that equips them with the necessary skills, critical thinking abilities, and problem-solving techniques to carry out their responsibilities. Through their careers, officials accumulate valuable experience that they can apply in critical situations. This allows them to make informed judgements based on their skills, experience, and expertise.
Furthermore, government officials are given the position and power to work for the betterment of the people they serve. So, they are obligated to consider the welfare of the entire population, whereas people’s will can be subjective. There can be a case where people’s opinions are divided, and if, in such cases, government officials try to follow the will of the people, there will be chaos in society. Without getting swayed by individuals wills, government officials should make decisions considering the overall welfare and future of society.
However, the task of government officials is to think from the people’s point of view, take a middle ground with the people’s will, and make better decisions for society. But if a government official starts to only think from his perspective and judge situations from his point of view, then the decisions made by any official may fail to help people get what they need and instead can harm them. For example, a government official who doesn’t live near a river but thinks a bridge over a river may bring prosperity to that area doesn't take into consideration the consequences people in such areas might have to face due to this decision and may end up destroying the lives of people in that area.
Furthermore, it can increase corruption if a government official is always allowed to follow his own judgement. As is known, these officials are mediators between the people and the government, so if they stop considering the needs of people, it will result in shutting down the screams of people. Some corrupt officials may use this opportunity to collude with powerful people to climb the ladder of success and only satisfy their needs. In this scenario, the people will be left unheard and fall into eternal suffering, though government officials were appointed to bring peace to them.
In conclusion, it cannot be said that government officials should only follow their own judgement or unquestioningly follow the will of the people; rather, a middle ground must be followed by them. Their ultimate goal should be the welfare of people or society; no selfish motives should be included. By maintaining a balance between these two directions, chaos can be avoided in society.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n order to effectively solve problems. Firstly, government officials undergo a ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overall welfare and future of society. However, the task of government official...
^^^
Line 7, column 530, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...river may bring prosperity to that area doesnt take into consideration the consequence...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ying the lives of people in that area. Furthermore, it can increase corruption ...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were appointed to bring peace to them. In conclusion, it cannot be said that go...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 31.0 12.4196629213 250% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2919.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 555.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25945945946 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85370353223 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88153346797 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475675675676 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 880.2 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5491233411 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.913043478 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1304347826 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265401344048 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921619866793 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513069997265 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160612172427 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516529514179 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.