Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The government job is one of the most dynamic and challenging roles in the job market, with government officials having a plethora of responsibilities to fulfill. There is a debate about whether government officials should rely solely on their own judgment or if they should also consider the will of the people they serve. While I partially agree with the notion, I believe that government officials should respect and show interest in the concerns of the people they serve in order to effectively solve problems.
Firstly, government officials undergo a rigorous selection process and dedicate a significant amount of time to prepare for their role. Additionally, they typically have a strong academic background. After completing their studies, they participate in a government training program that equips them with the necessary skills, critical thinking abilities, and problem-solving techniques to carry out their responsibilities. Through their careers, officials accumulate valuable experience which they can apply in critical situations. This allows them to make informed judgments based on their skills, experience, and expertise.
Furthermore, the people are the driving force behind the nation's progress and government officials primarily work towards the betterment of the people. However, society is diverse, and various groups have differing interests and perspectives based on their unique experiences. While some decisions may benefit certain groups, they may also divide others. Officials must maintain law and order while also utilizing their judgment to make the best decisions for the overall welfare of the society they serve.
However, not all government officials possess equal levels of experience and judgment skills, as these qualities vary from person to person. All areas, groups, and issues do not hold the same level of importance in terms of maintaining law and order. Different regions have distinct cultures, traditions, and demands. Consequently, government officials need to consider the will of the people in certain situations, taking into account the greater interest of society. For example, in a country like India, where Hindus form the majority, a Muslim official may need to make decisions that prioritize the broader societal interest to prevent negative consequences and maintain law and order.
In conclusion, while government officials should rely on their own judgment, in certain situations or for the greater good of society, they should unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. This will ensure effective governance, prevent corruption, and maintain high-quality service to the people
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...people are the driving force behind the nations progress and government officials prima...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
..., in a country like India, where Hindus form the majority, a Muslim official may nee...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2269.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68671679198 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98978060615 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2797415519 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.421052632 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306815316125 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933612371293 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874225147321 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189615486406 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937727764178 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.